Teams

Las Posas Highballs

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-13vs Westlake MonarchsLost 01
L#3 DoublesGina Howey / Teresa James vs Monica Helm / Olivia Powell3-6, 4-6
2025-12-07vs V- LLW Malibu Mavericks-RobinsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJamie Hadler / Beverly Torres vs Zhara Astra / Marie Robinson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-11-01vs WACTown GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesGinger Kohler / Aimee Stotser vs Kelsey Davis / Siena Heintz1-6, 2-6
2025-10-18vs Pierpont RacquettesWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Soto de Carvalho / Beverly Torres vs Patty Mallery / Julie McCaslin6-0, 6-1
2025-10-05vs Valle Lindo VolleygirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeverly Torres / Jamie Hadler vs Claudia Nevarez Lenehan / Anne Renard6-1, 6-1
2025-09-21vs Royal Court JestersLost 01
L#1 DoublesGinger Kohler / Maureen Finnigan vs Kathryn Pisaro / Sally Miller3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Jamie Hadler
published
2.89
Maureen Finnigan
published
2.84
Beverly Torres
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.79
2.75
Gina Howey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Aimee Stotser
published 3
2.63
Patty Bolland
published
2.60
Mary Nash
published
2.56
Ginger Kohler
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.55
Janet Talmadge
published
2.51
Susan Custance
published
2.51
J Chen
published
2.39
Riitta Andonian
published
2.34
Teresa James
published
2.11
Brenda Allison
published 2.5
Laura Foster
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Torres + Gina Howey11852% games+5.2% vs expected
Maureen Finnigan + Beverly Torres5159% games+5.1% vs expected
Riitta Andonian + Patty Bolland3444% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Finnigan + Gina Howey4156% gamesnot enough data
Janet Talmadge + Mary Nash033 matchesnot enough data
Aimee Stotser + Beverly Torres033 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Finnigan + Michelle Soto de Carvalho213 matchesnot enough data
J Chen + Patty Bolland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jamie Hadler
20W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Maureen Finnigan
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Beverly Torres
34W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Michelle Soto de Carvalho
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Gina Howey
44W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Aimee Stotser
2W–14L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Patty Bolland
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Mary Nash
3W–17L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Ginger Kohler
24W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
Janet Talmadge
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Susan Custance
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
J Chen
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Riitta Andonian
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Teresa James
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.34
2.5
Brenda Allison
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Laura Foster
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.