Teams

LPTC RED

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-04vs LTC-D NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesGwen Riley / Susan Whatley vs Linda Sexton / Nancy Driver0-6, 2-6
2023-08-21vs RHCC BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Whatley / Carole Lofing vs Aimee Petri / Rachel Kacmar0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLinda Strauss vs Katie Wither3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKellie Bonthron / Gwen Riley vs Valerie VanAlsburg / Julia McVey2-6, 4-6
2023-08-15vs BP REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarole Lofing / Gwen Riley vs Claudia Bricknell / Lauren Eddy4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-08-14vs MC NAVYLost 01
L#2 DoublesKellie Bonthron / Susan Whatley vs Tracy Adreon / Ellen Sprague1-6, 1-6
2023-08-07vs NJ GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarole Lofing / Gwen Riley vs Paige Orgel / Julie Lochner2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKellie Bonthron / Susan Whatley vs Holland Asbach / Pam Long0-6, 1-6
2023-07-24vs NJ PINKLost 01
L#2 DoublesKellie Bonthron / Carole Lofing vs Nancy Stapp / MIchelle Aurzada4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Gwen Riley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Carole Lofing
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.82
Linda Strauss
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.80
Susan Whatley
published
2.78
Kellie Bonthron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
Carissa Zook
published 3
Jennifer Halboth
published
Kimberly Barben
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Whatley + Kellie Bonthron8648% games−6.3% vs expected
Gwen Riley + Kellie Bonthron4944% games−9.7% vs expected
Gwen Riley + Linda Strauss3647% gamesnot enough data
Linda Strauss + Kellie Bonthron2641% gamesnot enough data
Gwen Riley + Carole Lofing3342% gamesnot enough data
Linda Strauss + Susan Whatley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gwen Riley
47W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Carole Lofing
14W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Linda Strauss
15W–35L career · 1 line in 2023
90%10%<1%
2.82
Susan Whatley
22W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Kellie Bonthron
27W–87L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Carissa Zook
4W–46L career · type A · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.40
Jennifer Halboth
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Barben
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.