Teams

Blossom Spinderellas

2025 55 & Over Fall Women - NA · 7.0 Tuesday Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-12-02vs AH Double TroubleLost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Dorwaldt / Barbara Ennis vs Hanh Tran / Bertie Mzyk3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Fair / Karin Shaw vs Theresa Holland / Patricia Phipps2-6, 5-7
2025-10-28vs Double VisionLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Hewitt / Carmel Chapline vs Donna Frick / Lisa Garza2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Trapp / Susan Brown vs Debbie Lowry / Leigh Freeman7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandra Franke / Florence Scrafield vs Christine Schenk / Elizabeth Hurt1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Tuesday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Lisa Bazley
published
3.11
Susan Dorwaldt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Diane Garner
published 3.5
3.06
Lisa Trapp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Karin Shaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Barbara Ennis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Terry Peel
published
2.62
Carmel Chapline
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Florence Scrafield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Fair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Franke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Fair + Sandra Franke7749% gamesnot enough data
Florence Scrafield + Terry Peel033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Bazley
6W–28L career · no lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13
Susan Dorwaldt
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3.5
Diane Garner
5W–19L career · no lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
3.09
Lisa Trapp
24W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Karin Shaw
1W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Barbara Ennis
5W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Terry Peel
32W–32L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Carmel Chapline
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Florence Scrafield
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Julie Fair
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Franke
7W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.