Teams

ASchmitt (Olde Providence)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-05vs TThomas/KGriffin (Sardis)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJimena Lozano de Bermudez / Melinda van Hecke vs Annaliese Anderson / Laura Shirey4-6, 2-6
2023-04-28vs LShelton (BCC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesStacey Lee / Jimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Andrea Sappenfield / Tracy Reitz7-5, 6-4
2023-04-21vs KLull (Bridgehampton)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Krug / Tricia Boyer vs Virginia Katzen / Lizette Conover3-6, 2-6
2023-04-19vs AIannuzzi/MSevigny (Carmel)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Krug / Lauren Packman vs Maria Sevigny / Beth Hahn0-6, 0-6
2023-04-18vs TMiller/DMaguire (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Krug / Tricia Boyer vs Lisa OBryan / Anna Sison3-6, 3-6
2023-03-20vs MCollins/KHoracek (Lifetime)Won 10
W#1 DoublesGeorgia Buck / Jimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Mary Collins / Heather Enlow-Novitsky6-3, 6-2
2023-03-03vs KShute/ATrexler (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Gretchen Andrews6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Alison Milas
published 3
3.05
Georgia Buck
published
3.02
Jimena Lozano de Bermudez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
3.00
Katie Monson
published
2.94
Anne Schmitt
published 3
2.63
Anne Krug
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Melinda van Hecke
published
2.50
Tiffany Eby
published
2.38
Lauren Packman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jimena Lozano de Bermudez + Alison Milas4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alison Milas
38W–34L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.14
Georgia Buck
10W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Jimena Lozano de Bermudez
58W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.02
Katie Monson
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Anne Schmitt
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Anne Krug
25W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
Melinda van Hecke
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
0%31%69%
2.57
Tiffany Eby
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Lauren Packman
5W–17L career · no lines in 2023
0%80%20%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.