Teams

Kiefer's Lobsters

2022 Marion Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-12-03vs MARION/James/Men/6.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe Marino / Tyler Jones vs Jerry Johnson / George Borlase2-6, 3-6
2022-11-25vs Spinners and SlicersWon 10
W#2 DoublesGlen Gandiongco / Tyler Jones vs Jeff Zysek / Rubin Crespo7-6, 6-4
2022-11-05vs Spinners and SlicersLost 01
L#1 DoublesJoe Marino / Tim Kennedy vs Sridhar Sagili / Rubin Crespo2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-11-04vs Spinners and SlicersWon 20
W#2 DoublesGlen Gandiongco / Venkat Veerapaneni vs Jeff Zysek / Mark DeBolt6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJoe Marino / Timothy Roberson vs Jerry McLauchlin / Maynard Luetgert6-2, 6-0
2022-10-30vs MARION/James/Men/6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJoe Marino / Tyler Jones vs Robert Mazzeo / Kent Bradford5-7, 5-7
2022-10-28vs MARION/James/Men/6.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesGlen Gandiongco / Tyler Jones vs Robert Kluemper / Michael James6-2, 7-5
2022-10-14vs Spinners and SlicersLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoe Marino / Chris Vorisek vs Peter Grosshans / Rubin Crespo4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
3.37
Venkat Veerapaneni
published
3.16
Glen Gandiongco
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Joe Marino
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Chaya Jollu
published 3
2.78
Chris Vorisek
published 3
Scott Kiefer
published
Timothy Roberson
published
Tyler Jones
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Glen Gandiongco + Chaya Jollu224 matchesnot enough data
Tyler Jones + Venkat Veerapaneni303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christopher Clements
21W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.50
Venkat Veerapaneni
11W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Glen Gandiongco
123W–124L career · 6 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Joe Marino
64W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Chaya Jollu
104W–83L career · no lines in 2022
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Chris Vorisek
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
Scott Kiefer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Timothy Roberson
12W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tyler Jones
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.