Teams

Branam/Bella Vista/KTC

2026 Adult 55 & Over Spring 1 League · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-26vs Reeh/Springdale/SRCLost 12
W#1 DoublesPablo Corona / Bruce Barkley vs David Sam / Jean-Francois Meullenet6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRandolph Jackson / David Beauchamp vs Kyden Reeh / Tihomir Buncic6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRichard Branam / Rickard Hood vs Jack Kern / Charles Bruce6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2026-04-19vs Reeh/Springdale/SRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesRichard Branam / Andy Watkins vs Charles Bruce / Javier Cordero1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMatthew Fulton / Ryan Rieger vs Sean Mahoney / Brent Obana6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Beauchamp / Randolph Jackson vs Jack Kern / Brent Jimenez6-7, 6-7
2026-04-18vs Reeh/Springdale/SRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMax Garcia / Pablo Corona vs Jean-Francois Meullenet / Tommy Karr4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJames Carr / Rickard Hood vs Robert Meek / Charles Bruce4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHershel Blevins / Jason Cantey vs David Sam / Brent Jimenez4-6, 2-6
2026-04-11vs Reeh/Springdale/SRCWon 21
L#1 DoublesMatthew Fulton / Ryan Rieger vs Kyden Reeh / Jean-Francois Meullenet1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBruce Barkley / Pablo Corona vs Tihomir Buncic / Robert Meek6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Branam / Max Garcia vs Jack Kern / Javier Cordero7-6, 6-3
2026-04-08vs Reeh/Springdale/SRCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Fulton / Ryan Rieger vs Tihomir Buncic / David Sam7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHershel Blevins / Rickard Hood vs Tommy Karr / Robert Meek5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAndy Watkins / Jason Cantey vs Kyden Reeh / Sean Mahoney3-6, 3-6
2026-03-07vs Reeh/Springdale/SRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Fulton / Hershel Blevins vs Jack Kern / Tommy Karr7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRichard Branam / Ryan Rieger vs Tihomir Buncic / Robert Meek0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJames Carr / Rickard Hood vs Brent Obana / Sean Mahoney3-6, 2-6
2026-02-28vs Reeh/Springdale/SRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Carr / Bruce Barkley vs Kyden Reeh / David Sam0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Branam / Max Garcia vs Tommy Karr / Jean-Francois Meullenet0-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRandolph Jackson / David Beauchamp vs Brent Obana / Javier Cordero3-6, 5-7
2026-02-21vs Reeh/Springdale/SRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesPablo Corona / Max Garcia vs Tommy Karr / Jean-Francois Meullenet5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMatthew Fulton / Hershel Blevins vs Robert Meek / Tihomir Buncic0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Rieger / Bruce Barkley vs David Sam / Charles Bruce2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Reeh/Springdale/SRC7120413179
2Branam/Bella Vista/KTC1742042279

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Randolph Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.75
Pablo Corona
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.71
Bruce Barkley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.67
Ryan Rieger
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.54
David Beauchamp
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Matthew Fulton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.51
Hershel Blevins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Jason Cantey
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.40
Rickard Hood
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Richard Branam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
3.31
Andy Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andy Watkins + Jason Cantey4252% games−4.3% vs expected
Richard Branam + Andy Watkins134 matchesnot enough data
Bruce Barkley + Pablo Corona404 matchesnot enough data
Rickard Hood + Matthew Fulton224 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Rieger + Matthew Fulton134 matchesnot enough data
Randolph Jackson + David Beauchamp033 matchesnot enough data
Richard Branam + Matthew Fulton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Randolph Jackson
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
Pablo Corona
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Bruce Barkley
20W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Ryan Rieger
4W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
David Beauchamp
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.54
Matthew Fulton
4W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.51
Hershel Blevins
3W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
Jason Cantey
18W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Rickard Hood
29W–26L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%76%23%
3.40
Richard Branam
15W–16L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Andy Watkins
15W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.