Teams

Ciccone- Highland Country Club

2024 Sandhills Tri Level 18 & over · 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-16vs Bradley - MazarickSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSerriah Ciccone / Denise O'Dell vs Amy Bradley / Denise Bauer Frazier6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDrake Neff / Susan Miller vs Dawn Burt / Sandra Martin6-3, 6-0
2024-06-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie Cherry / Denise O'Dell vs Corinna Williamson / Tammy Keller4-6, 2-6
2024-06-11vs Bradley - MazarickWon 10
W#2 DoublesSerriah Ciccone / Laurie Cherry vs Amy Bradley / Theresa Jones6-1, 6-4
2024-05-28vs Resseguie - MazarickLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie Cherry / Denise O'Dell vs Lauren Blashford / Melissa Parker3-6, 4-6
2024-05-20vs Hasty - Highland Country ClubLost 02
L#2 DoublesSerriah Ciccone / Denise O'Dell vs Charlotte Hasty / Alex Hammill4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDrake Neff / Katie Bullard vs Molly Lewis / Averi Brown2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Marion Bryan
published
3.18
Dawn Dixon
published 3.5
2.96
Laurie Cherry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Drake Neff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Tyler Chavonne
published
2.75
Katie Bullard
published
2.74
Serriah Ciccone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Denise O'Dell
published 3
Caroline Garber
published 2.5
1.96
Courtney McDaniel
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tyler Chavonne + Katie Bullard7357% games+5.3% vs expected
Serriah Ciccone + Drake Neff5251% gamesnot enough data
Serriah Ciccone + Laurie Cherry213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marion Bryan
18W–27L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Dawn Dixon
32W–30L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Laurie Cherry
93W–106L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Drake Neff
38W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Tyler Chavonne
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Anne Catherine Williams
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katie Bullard
11W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Serriah Ciccone
49W–54L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Denise O'Dell
16W–20L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
2.5
Caroline Garber
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Courtney McDaniel
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.