Teams

MSIL A18&O 3.0M Castro-Champaign

2026 MSIL Adult 18 & Over -MSIL East League · East MSIL A18&O 3.0M

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-18vs MSIL A18&O 3.0M Smith-ChampaignLost 02
L#1 SinglesSteven Peckins vs John Lee5-7, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAasheesh Randeo vs Aaron Pearlman0-6, 1-6
2026-07-11vs MSIL A18&O 3.0M Smith-ChampaignLost 03
L#1 SinglesSteven Peckins vs Dantzler Smith6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNirmal Gokarn / Jose Andino vs Sung Min Moon / Clark Brooks1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesYifan Ding / Yingjia Gu vs Timothy Ellis / Hyegi Min3-6, 0-6
2026-06-27vs MSIL A18&O 3.0M Smith-ChampaignLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames OH / Yifan Ding vs Dmitry Dmitriev / Kshitij Vijayvargia1-6, 1-6
2026-06-06vs MSIL A18&O 3.0M Smith-ChampaignLost 12
W#1 SinglesAlden Cheng vs Aditya Gopalan6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJose Andino / Yifan Ding vs Hyegi Min / John Lee2-6, 3-3
L#2 SinglesSteven Peckins vs Alberto Albejjani3-6, 1-6
2026-05-30vs MSIL A18&O 3.0M Smith-ChampaignWon 21
W#1 SinglesAlden Cheng vs Alberto Albejjani6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSteven Peckins vs Jake Rundall6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesYutao Zhou / Yifan Ding vs Timothy Ellis / Jianzong Pi3-6, 6-7
2026-05-09vs MSIL A18&O 3.0M Smith-ChampaignWon 31
W#1 SinglesAlden Cheng vs Alberto Albejjani6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarl Guo / James OH vs Clark Brooks / Dmitry Dmitriev5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSteven Peckins vs Jay Rafi2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAasheesh Randeo / Yutao Zhou vs Dantzler Smith / Jake Rundall0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for East MSIL A18&O 3.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Noel Castro
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.13
Alden Cheng
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.82
Carl Guo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Jose Andino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Andrew Flores
published 3
2.68
Yifan Ding
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.59
Steven Peckins
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.47
Aasheesh Randeo
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noel Castro
65W–41L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
3
Alden Cheng
14W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
3
Carl Guo
22W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
Jose Andino
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Andrew Flores
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Christopher Stewart
no matches on record · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Yifan Ding
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Steven Peckins
4W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
3
Aasheesh Randeo
0W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.