Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/40+W(Johnson)(EPTC#4)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA ADULT 40 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Amy Orourke
usually #1 Singles 35%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 4.5
3.78
Debbie Pippins
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 4
3.16
Angelina Colquitt
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Charlotte Johnson
published
Grace Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 51%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published
Katherine Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Linda Kern
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Lorena Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
Lucy Pfirman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Martha Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Rebecca Romero
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Sandra Pope
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Ninkovich
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Pippins + Sandra Pope231456% games+3.2% vs expected
Angelina Colquitt + Sandra Pope19957% games−1.1% vs expected
Debbie Pippins + Linda Kern9261% games−5.1% vs expected
Linda Kern + Angelina Colquitt101647% games−19.0% vs expected
Grace Gomez + Sandra Pope13263% gamesnot enough data
Angelina Colquitt + Lucy Pfirman5647% gamesnot enough data
Grace Gomez + Amy Orourke5253% gamesnot enough data
Lorena Reynolds + Martha Cunningham4344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Orourke
69W–33L career · 26 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
4
Debbie Pippins
82W–53L career · 13 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
3.5
Angelina Colquitt
58W–61L career · 14 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
3.16
Charlotte Johnson
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Grace Gomez
145W–85L career · 53 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katherine Harrison
22W–17L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Kern
37W–31L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lorena Reynolds
78W–105L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lucy Pfirman
18W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maria Julieta Hall-Ochoa
67W–64L career · 31 lines in 2025
not enough data
Martha Cunningham
45W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Romero
27W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Pope
74W–32L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Ninkovich
48W–43L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.