Teams

Am.Hobbs18T

2025 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-26vs To.Sutler18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesSilpa Yalamanchili / Ana Maria Allessi vs Jennifer Kaulback / Kristen Levine1-6, 3-6
2025-07-12vs Je.Straughn18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesNamita Lokare / Ana Maria Allessi vs Kathryn Horneffer / Anh Vu7-5, 6-2
2025-07-05vs Li.Kempf18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesAna Maria Allessi / Namita Lokare vs Lauren Triebert / Griffin Lamb4-6, 1-6
2025-06-21vs To.Sutler18TLost 01
L#3 DoublesSilpa Yalamanchili / Namita Lokare vs Samantha Pickett / Jennifer Kaulback2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-17vs La.Fye18T4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesNamita Lokare / Ana Maria Allessi vs Sarah Lukz / Terri Bartucca6-2, 6-1
2025-06-13vs Me.Everitt18T4.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesNamita Lokare / Ana Maria Allessi vs Heather Hofmann / Kelly Kelly6-2, 6-2
2025-05-31vs Li.Kempf18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesSilpa Yalamanchili / Namita Lokare vs Kari Barsness / Lauren Triebert6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Gabrielle Shields
published
3.81
Jenna Raynor
published
3.71
Hannah Boghosian
published
3.52
Amy Hobbs
published 3.5
3.44
Liz Arcos
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
3.40
Namita Lokare
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Lauren Redmond
published
3.06
Silpa Yalamanchili
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Ana Maria Allessi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jordan Fieldstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Arcos + Namita Lokare12266% games+6.6% vs expected
Liz Arcos + Amy Hobbs6359% games−0.3% vs expected
Ana Maria Allessi + Namita Lokare314 matchesnot enough data
Lauren Redmond + Amy Hobbs213 matchesnot enough data
Namita Lokare + Silpa Yalamanchili123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gabrielle Shields
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
Jenna Raynor
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Hannah Boghosian
20W–13L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
3.5
Amy Hobbs
52W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Liz Arcos
193W–123L career · 13 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
3.5
Namita Lokare
75W–42L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
Lauren Redmond
22W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
3
Silpa Yalamanchili
80W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
3
Ana Maria Allessi
80W–86L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Jordan Fieldstein
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.