Teams

18 & Over Women 4.0 - Riviera Mary Vanegas

Adult 18 & Over 2022 · 2022 18 & Over Women 4.0-Flight 1

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
L#1 DoublesLynda Gomez / Ivelisse Berio vs Antonia Adrover / Isabel Raymond3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesIrisel Collazo vs Yarymar Rivera6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaria Kamilla Larsen / Ingrid Lozada vs Yenis Larez / Ninette Canals7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMonique Gracia / Mary Vanegas vs Darcy Ramirez / Maria Cardona7-6, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMonique Gracia / Irmaris Pizarro vs Lidianne Emanuelli / Gabriela Reyes4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMaria Kamilla Larsen / Mary Vanegas vs Cristina Rivera / Paola Oller6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesIrisel Collazo vs Liesl Costa6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLynda Gomez / Ivelisse Berio vs Giovanna Ramirez / Luissette Goyco6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesIvelisse Berio / Lynda Gomez vs Yenis Larez / Mariana Nacer Elizalde6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesIngrid Lozada / Mary Vanegas vs Darcy Ramirez / Yarymar Rivera6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMonique Gracia / Martha Nieves vs Isabel Raymond / Antonia Adrover5-7, 5-7
L#1 DoublesIrisel Collazo / Irmaris Pizarro vs Maria Cirino / Jessa Schaid2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLynda Gomez vs Raluca Parnell4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMonique Gracia / Martha Nieves vs Amy Wadsworth / Mona Wilson6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJoanne Ramos / Mary Vanegas vs Lorna Ramirez / Laura Bazarian1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesIrisel Collazo vs Maria Cirino6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRebecca Ramirez / Joanne Ramos vs Cecelia Puopolo / Olivia Funk6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesIngrid Lozada / Mary Vanegas vs Mona Wilson / Kay Bassi6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesIngrid Lozada / Mary Vanegas vs Cristina Rivera / Gabriela Reyes3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMonique Gracia / Martha Nieves vs Yarieli Medina-Claudio / Ivelisse Vera-Irizarry6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesIrisel Collazo vs Camila Rosado7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesIvelisse Berio / Lynda Gomez vs Lidianne Emanuelli / Janhec Perez-Pasarell6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesIvelisse Berio / Lynda Gomez vs Maria Cirino / Lorna Ramirez6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesIrisel Collazo vs Jessa Schaid6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLucyll Correa / Mary Vanegas vs Mona Wilson / Cecelia Puopolo6-4, 7-5
L#1 DoublesIrmaris Pizarro / Joanne Ramos vs Yenis Larez / Esther A Zelaya Flores3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesIvelisse Berio / Lynda Gomez vs Mayra Garcia-Sola / Mariana Nacer Elizalde6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesIrisel Collazo vs Marina Cardona6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMartha Nieves / Ingrid Lozada vs Antonia Adrover / Isabel Raymond3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesIvelisse Berio / Lynda Gomez vs Maruxa Dumont / Giovanna Ramirez6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMonique Gracia / Mary Vanegas vs Yarieli Medina-Claudio / Cristina Rivera6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesIrisel Collazo vs Liesl Costa6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesIngrid Lozada / Martha Nieves vs Paola Oller / Gabriela Reyes6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2022 18 & Over Women 4.0-Flight 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Mary Vanegas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.77
Ingrid Lozada
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Monique Gracia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Irisel Collazo
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4
3.70
Ivelisse Berio
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.58
Lynda Gomez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.50
Irmaris Pizarro
published 4
3.48
Joanne Ramos
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lucyll Correa
published
Martha Nieves
published
Suzette Olivieri
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monique Gracia + Mary Vanegas11754% games+3.3% vs expected
Suzette Olivieri + Irmaris Pizarro5258% games+2.1% vs expected
Mary Vanegas + Ivelisse Berio6360% games+0.0% vs expected
Ingrid Lozada + Irisel Collazo6651% games−2.5% vs expected
Monique Gracia + Ingrid Lozada5653% games−3.6% vs expected
Monique Gracia + Suzette Olivieri1536% games−15.4% vs expected
Lynda Gomez + Ivelisse Berio7654% gamesnot enough data
Mary Vanegas + Ingrid Lozada5167% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Vanegas
58W–56L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Ingrid Lozada
41W–37L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Monique Gracia
65W–52L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Irisel Collazo
81W–51L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Ivelisse Berio
35W–28L career · 7 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.70
Lynda Gomez
19W–15L career · 8 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Irmaris Pizarro
10W–29L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
Joanne Ramos
22W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.48
Lucyll Correa
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Martha Nieves
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzette Olivieri
39W–25L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.