Teams

LEBTC RED

2023 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 6.5 - ITA

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-20vs CK REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesWarren Olsen / Janee Wren vs Aaron Merritt / Gina Akins4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesStephan Termaat / Suzanne Termaat vs EDWARD PETERS / Julie Merritt0-6, 3-6
2023-08-13vs PH BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesJanee Wren / Jay Wren vs Kori White / Chris Pettofrezzo7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-30vs KC-CC GREENLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanee Wren / Jay Wren vs Jennifer Gonyea / Ben MacDonald1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStephan Termaat / Suzanne Termaat vs Holly Sharpeta / Ken Sharpeta6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-07-23vs LTFC YELLOWWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Willson / Janee Wren vs Mitchell Kaplan / Crystal Clark6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-09vs LEBTC BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesJanee Wren / Jamie Dreyer vs Tate Miller / Melissa Miller6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Jay Wren
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.77
Jamie Dreyer
published
2.76
Janee Wren
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Bernie Gaider
published 3
2.68
Jennifer Flint
published
2.56
Suzanne Termaat
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Anders McConnell
published 2.5
Emily Dreyer
published
Nita Sosebee
published
Stephan Termaat
published
Warren Olsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephan Termaat + Suzanne Termaat9458% games+11.1% vs expected
Emily Dreyer + Jamie Dreyer14852% gamesnot enough data
Jay Wren + Janee Wren5749% gamesnot enough data
Nita Sosebee + Bernie Gaider123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jay Wren
57W–99L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
2.94
Jamie Dreyer
29W–24L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Janee Wren
156W–105L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%4%
2.76
3
Bernie Gaider
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Flint
19W–15L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
2.5
Suzanne Termaat
89W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%34%66%
2.56
2.5
Anders McConnell
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Emily Dreyer
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nita Sosebee
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephan Termaat
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Warren Olsen
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.