← Teams

MAC-Wright (7.0)

2022 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.45 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
John Magaddino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Jeffrey Bayless
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Fenn Bourland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Diane Malhotra
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.22
Michele Desmarais
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Zachary Wright
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.13
Scott Keeney
published 3.5
3.13
Sarah Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Barbara Gram
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Results8 ties
2022-05-27Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesZachary Wright / Catherine Leedy vs John van Leeuwen / Chris van Leeuwen6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesFenn Bourland / Diane Malhotra vs Chrys Culver / Tom Bruggere6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Sarah Robertson vs Betsy Henningsen / Scott Mayer6-2, 7-6
2022-05-20Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChresten Gram / Barbara Gram vs Theresa Berry / Brady Berry3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Magaddino / Diane Malhotra vs Colin Looi / Ellen Hodges5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-13Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesZachary Wright / Michele Desmarais vs Larry Liu / Cheryl Geisler5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChresten Gram / Barbara Gram vs John Hapke / Maryann Velez6-4, 7-6
2022-05-07Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChresten Gram / Barbara Gram vs Marianne Conroy / Michael Lavios6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCatherine Leedy / John Magaddino vs Kristi Vargas / Paul Best6-1, 6-1
2022-05-06Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesZachary Wright / Kim Wright vs Sharon Loomis-Malin / Ed Schwartz6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMichele Desmarais / Jeffrey Bayless vs Barbara Ferre / Randy Boose4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-04-23Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesBarbara Gram / Chresten Gram vs Pat Kaplan / Bill Lowblad6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Sarah Robertson vs Angela Addington / Larry Kaster6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesZachary Wright / Elizabeth Burns vs Alan Potts / Maritess Mayer6-1, 6-2
2022-04-20Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesZachary Wright / Michele Desmarais vs Andrea Vicino / John Yu6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Robertson / Fenn Bourland vs Jackie Konen / Robert Truong6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Jeffrey Bayless vs James Lawrence / Sandi Martes6-4, 6-2
2022-03-20Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesKim Wright / Zachary Wright vs Paul Laurent / Traci Laurent6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesBarbara Gram / Chresten Gram vs Colleen Walker / Steve Harris6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Jeffrey Bayless vs Sharon Loomis-Malin / Ron Selis6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
John Magaddino
84W–40L career
0%83%17%
3.48
3.5
Jeffrey Bayless
130W–100L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Fenn Bourland
119W–67L career
1%99%0%
3.26
3.5
Diane Malhotra
46W–26L career
2%97%1%
3.25
3.5
Michele Desmarais
56W–45L career
7%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Zachary Wright
177W–142L career
3%97%0%
3.17
3.5
Scott Keeney
27W–42L career
9%91%0%
3.13
3.5
Sarah Robertson
72W–98L career
9%91%0%
3.13
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04
3
Barbara Gram
127W–129L career
0%97%3%
2.89

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.