The Lakes/Alwood-Silver W3.5S

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

23 players · average NTRP 3.43 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Schedule2 played

2026-05-30Won 1–0

W#3 DoublesCourtney Dunagan / Heidi Fuller vs Gemela Lewis / Jazmine Urquhart6-3, 7-6

2026-05-09vs Gleneagles/Steyn-Pieroni W3.5SWon 1–0

W#3 DoublesCourtney Dunagan / Carlin Mihm vs Gail Hasson / Florence Regan6-2, 6-2

A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.

Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49

Michelle Buchanan

usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

3.47

Audrey Jarrin

usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5

3.45

Carlin Mihm

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.45

Brenda Bingham

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5

3.40

Kristi Flanagan

usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published —

3.40

Michelle Silver

usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #2 Singles 30% · published —

3.39

Tracy Akbany

usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Singles 27% · published —

3.37

Jill Fain

usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published —

3.35

Kimberly DiNota

usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published —

3.35

Heidi Fuller

usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published —

3.33

Jennifer Lazar

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —

3.32

Jennifer Byrne

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published —

3.28

Jennifer Deaton

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published —

3.27

Shelly Gillert

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published —

3.26

Allison Leeper

usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.25

Paige Green

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published —

3.22

Debi Meuret

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.21

Heather Alwood

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published —

3.16

Jo Alamares

usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published —

3.15

Amanda Fritz

usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3

3.12

Courtney Dunagan

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5

3.11

Kristi Merrill

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Tamra Bryan

usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Deaton + Brenda Bingham	6–0	58% games	+7.5% vs expected
Michelle Silver + Tracy Akbany	3–3	58% games	+6.9% vs expected
Michelle Buchanan + Tracy Akbany	3–2	56% games	+3.4% vs expected
Allison Leeper + Carlin Mihm	3–2	53% games	not enough data
Kristi Merrill + Jennifer Byrne	2–2	4 matches	not enough data
Michelle Buchanan + Michelle Silver	2–2	4 matches	not enough data
Allison Leeper + Amanda Fritz	1–2	3 matches	not enough data
Jennifer Deaton + Jill Fain	1–2	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Michelle Buchanan

16W–18L career · 9 lines in 2026

52%48%<1%

3.49

3.5

Audrey Jarrin

11W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026

<1%58%42%

3.47

3.5

Carlin Mihm

15W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026

<1%63%37%

3.45

3.5

Brenda Bingham

19W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026

<1%63%37%

3.45

—

Kristi Flanagan

26W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026

<1%76%23%

3.40

—

Michelle Silver

19W–16L career · 10 lines in 2026

<1%76%23%

3.40

—

Tracy Akbany

25W–26L career · 11 lines in 2026

<1%78%22%

3.39

—

Jill Fain

23W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026

<1%81%18%

3.37

—

Kimberly DiNota

25W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026

1%85%15%

3.35

—

Heidi Fuller

17W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026

1%85%14%

3.35

—

Jennifer Lazar

9W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026

1%88%11%

3.33

—

Jennifer Byrne

14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026

1%89%9%

3.32

—

Jennifer Deaton

20W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026

2%92%6%

3.28

—

Shelly Gillert

8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026

3%92%5%

3.27

3.5

Allison Leeper

16W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026

3%92%5%

3.26

—

Paige Green

15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026

3%93%4%

3.25

3.5

Debi Meuret

9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026

6%92%2%

3.22

—

Heather Alwood

1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026

7%91%2%

3.21

—

Jo Alamares

12W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026

13%86%1%

3.16

Amanda Fritz

15W–18L career · 8 lines in 2026

<1%15%85%

3.15

3.5

Courtney Dunagan

13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026

20%80%<1%

3.12

—

Kristi Merrill

8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026

22%77%<1%

3.11

—

Tamra Bryan

3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.