Teams

Harrell/55/3.0/WD/BREC

2025 BR Adult 55 & Over - Women Day · 3.0 BR (55&O) Women Day

12 players · average NTRP 2.92 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-10vs Mclindon/55/3.0/WD/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Saporito / Roslyn Butler vs Lori Wismans / Denise Pickering2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCynthia Ross / Christine Mermigas vs Michele Mclindon / Meghan McCracken3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJeanie Bastin / Megan Harrell vs Carole Wilkins / Angela DeJean3-6, 2-6
2025-02-10vs Delaney/55/3.0/WD/BOCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeanie Bastin / Megan Harrell vs Kelli Harton / Carolyn Elofson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesPaula Sanchez / DeeDee Bahlinger vs Mary Graffeo / Elizabeth Delaney6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAllynn Kennedy / Dawn McManus vs Terri Ducote / Phyllis Pedersen3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 BR (55&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
DeeDee Bahlinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Jeanne Herry
published
2.91
Megan Harrell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Roslyn Butler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Bonny Van
published 3
2.70
Christine Mermigas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Mary Saporito
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Paula Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Jeanie Bastin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.49
Allynn Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.48
Cynthia Ross
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Dawn McManus
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Ross + Christine Mermigas4256% games+5.3% vs expected
Paula Sanchez + Allynn Kennedy2452% games+3.1% vs expected
Paula Sanchez + Jeanie Bastin2845% games+0.0% vs expected
Jeanie Bastin + Megan Harrell2445% games−7.9% vs expected
Mary Saporito + Jeanne Herry2641% games−8.3% vs expected
Jeanie Bastin + Allynn Kennedy1737% games−11.6% vs expected
Megan Harrell + Mary Saporito2338% gamesnot enough data
Megan Harrell + Jeanne Herry123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
DeeDee Bahlinger
9W–4L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Jeanne Herry
19W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Megan Harrell
29W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Roslyn Butler
54W–48L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Bonny Van
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Christine Mermigas
14W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Mary Saporito
27W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Paula Sanchez
10W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Jeanie Bastin
7W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
2.5
Allynn Kennedy
10W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
0%54%46%
2.49
3
Cynthia Ross
10W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
3
Dawn McManus
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.