Teams

Skinner/Chattanooga

2025 Adult 55 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.5 women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-13vs Palisoc/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Covey / Carol Starnes vs Cathy Palisoc / Sarah Delay1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKim Glascock / Camille Burkley-Wilson vs Lynne Barkeloo / Amy Weathers3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCriss Skinner / Kimberly Rogg vs Michelle Larson / Shana Patten3-6, 3-6
2025-03-15vs Palisoc/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesKimberly Rogg / Camille Burkley-Wilson vs Cathy Palisoc / Sarah Delay1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Benton / Patty Vanvalkinburgh vs Michelle Larson / Michelle Rauch6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Covey / Caroline Ashton vs Heather Tuttle / Dee Dee Buckley3-6, 5-7
2025-03-08vs Palisoc/ChattanoogaLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Glascock / Sandra Sadler vs Amy Weathers / Michelle Rauch4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCriss Skinner / Beth Covey vs Cathy Palisoc / Sarah Delay2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKimberly Rogg / Caroline Ashton vs Lucynda Cynda Holmes / Dee Dee Buckley6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Kimberly Rogg
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Camille Burkley-Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Beth Covey
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Carol Starnes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Criss Skinner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Anita Decosimo
published 3.5
3.12
Caroline Ashton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Kim Glascock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Linda Benton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Patty Vanvalkinburgh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sandra Sadler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camille Burkley-Wilson + Kimberly Rogg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Rogg
11W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Camille Burkley-Wilson
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
Beth Covey
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carol Starnes
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Criss Skinner
3W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Anita Decosimo
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Caroline Ashton
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
Kim Glascock
2W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Linda Benton
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patty Vanvalkinburgh
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Sadler
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.