Teams

ALPINE HILLS CW6.5A

2023 COMBO · Women 6.5

24 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Amy Sendil
published 4.5
3.76
Tracy Fujieda
published
3.58
Katja Gagen
published
3.47
Shea Boitano
published
3.42
Kate Fenwick
published
3.42
Allison Carlson
published 3.5
3.40
Wendy Mcadam
published
3.27
Shannon Basch
published
3.23
3.19
Joi Deaser
published
3.18
Leila Mehra
published
3.15
Allison Moser
published 3.5
3.15
Caren Taylor
published 3.5
3.13
Sally Aalfs
published
3.12
Tina Molumphy
published
3.06
Kristina Paszek
published
2.97
Sally Ann Reiss
published
2.68
Sylvia Thompson
published
2.64
Melissa Land
published
2.61
Tine Normann-Badger
published
2.51
Olivia Ward
published
2.43
Kristin Brew
published
2.35
Jami Worthington
published
Johonna Katz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Mcadam + Tina Molumphy3253% games+5.8% vs expected
Kristina Paszek + Allison Moser123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Miller Hornbeek + Tina Molumphy213 matchesnot enough data
Caren Taylor + Leila Mehra123 matchesnot enough data
Allison Carlson + Kate Fenwick213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Sendil
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.92
Tracy Fujieda
28W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Katja Gagen
36W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%27%73%
3.58
Shea Boitano
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.47
Kate Fenwick
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Allison Carlson
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%27%
3.42
Wendy Mcadam
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%24%
3.40
Shannon Basch
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Susan Miller Hornbeek
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Joi Deaser
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.19
Leila Mehra
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Allison Moser
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Caren Taylor
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Sally Aalfs
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Tina Molumphy
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
Kristina Paszek
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Sally Ann Reiss
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
Sylvia Thompson
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
0%10%90%
2.68
Melissa Land
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
Tine Normann-Badger
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
Olivia Ward
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
Kristin Brew
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%69%31%
2.43
Jami Worthington
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%86%14%
2.35
Johonna Katz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.