Teams

Matthews (Spring 2025)

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 18 & OVER · MEN 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-17vs McCabe 18 SpringLost 04
L#1 DoublesBen Hawkins / David Kimbrough vs David Hartness / David McCabe3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNick Nguyen / Steve Peterson vs FORREST MAREADY / Maverick Maready7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMike Voorheis vs Jason Ingraham6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrendan Bastable / Robert Matthews vs Christopher Soule / Laurence Nadeau6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-21vs Basta/Lanier/JanikLost 23
W#1 DoublesJeremy Lozito / Steve Peterson vs Nick Basta / Matthew Hilliard6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJames Werder vs James Dawson1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJack Doetzer / Robert Matthews vs David Eggleston / Andrew Lanier6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesMichael Martorelli vs Walker Abney3-6
L#3 DoublesNick Nguyen / Brendan Bastable vs Chris Hoenig / Johannes Haasbroek2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-03-31vs Basta/Lanier/JanikWon 41
W#1 DoublesDavid Kimbrough / Ben Hawkins vs David Eggleston / Chris Hoenig7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMichael Martorelli vs James Dawson1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJeremy Lozito / Richard Davis vs Matthew Hilliard / Kirk Walsh6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesCraig Phelps vs Robby Knapp6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Matthews / Jack Doetzer vs Nick Basta / Andrew Lanier6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-15vs Basta/Lanier/JanikSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Kimbrough / Nick Nguyen vs John Cooper / Michael McManus6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJoshua Phanco vs James Dawson3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBen Whitlock / Richard Davis vs Andrew Lanier / Matthew Hilliard4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJames Werder vs Johannes Haasbroek6-7, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Brendan Bastable
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Michael Martorelli
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.83
James Werder
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.70
Ben Whitlock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Jeremy Lozito
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
David Kimbrough
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.60
Steve Peterson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Joshua Phanco
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.58
Ben Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.57
Mike Voorheis
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.43
Jack Doetzer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Craig Phelps
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Lozito + Steve Peterson2449% games−7.2% vs expected
Ben Hawkins + Jack Doetzer303 matchesnot enough data
Ben Whitlock + Mike Voorheis033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brendan Bastable
38W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
Michael Martorelli
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
James Werder
25W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Ben Whitlock
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Jeremy Lozito
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
David Kimbrough
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.61
Steve Peterson
16W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
Joshua Phanco
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Ben Hawkins
27W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
Mike Voorheis
10W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Jack Doetzer
15W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Craig Phelps
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.