Teams

Powers-GCC

2025 Combo 18 & Over-DLT · Women 6.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-07vs Joel-CCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesLizzie Powers / Mary Killebrew vs Kaley Joel / Teresa Reed3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Barnes / Kerri McQueen vs Maghan Ashmore / Robin Toler1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAllyn Camp / MaryNeff Stewart vs Samantha Myers / Chloe Darden3-6, 1-6
2025-09-28vs Haynes-BearpenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLizzie Powers / Mary Killebrew vs Holly Wells / Sara Litton7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMaryNeff Stewart / Nancy Johnson vs Jordan Langston / Paige Burchfield6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2025-09-22vs Hamrick-Bear PenLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Pannell / Meredith Brown vs Katie Boykin / Melissa Hazlewood6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessica Barnes / Kerri McQueen vs Susan Adams / Meredith Etheridge6-7, 2-6
2025-09-08vs Miller-GGCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesLizzie Powers / Claire Smith vs Shelby Ballinger / Brittany McTeer4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLindsay Powers / Mary Pannell vs Elizabeth Nipper / Molly McAdams6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMaryNeff Stewart / Kerri McQueen vs Liz Vickers / Aimee Washington2-6, 5-7
2025-09-03vs Boykin-CCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLizzie Powers / Claire Smith vs Kathryn Boykin / Haley Chaney4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJessica Barnes / Kerri McQueen vs Tracy Craddock / Kristen Crow6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-26vs Spradling-CCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLizzie Powers / Mary Killebrew vs Taylor Ward / Brooke Tims6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMaryNeff Stewart / Allyn Camp vs Misty Moseley / Rhonda Allen0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Lindsay Powers
published
2.86
Allyn Camp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Lizzie Powers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Mary Killebrew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
MaryNeff Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Kerri McQueen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Pannell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MaryNeff Stewart + Allyn Camp224 matchesnot enough data
Mary Killebrew + Lizzie Powers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Powers
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Allyn Camp
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
2.86
Lizzie Powers
13W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Mary Killebrew
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
MaryNeff Stewart
4W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Kerri McQueen
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Mary Pannell
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.