Teams

Touch of Gray

2022 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-06-29vs Nicer AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnnette Durham / Laney Derry vs Janna Tipton / Treva Pline6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSherry Huber / Sherri Felton vs Patricia Aarestad / Jennifer Clements6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRuth Fritz / Lisa Derry vs Jody Orr / Patricia Hoffman2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-06-27vs COGsWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaney Derry / Annette Durham vs Cindy Haroian / Stephanie Churchman6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSherry Huber / Maureen Earl vs Liz Crookston / Jodi Whittaker6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeanna McMahon / Ruth Fritz vs Kathlyn Johans / Allison Rohnert6-3, 6-3
2022-06-22vs Nicer AcesWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Butler / Lisa Derry vs Angel Marie Bowie / Christina Elder2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSherry Huber / Jill Call vs Treva Pline / Amy Taivalkoski6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSherri Felton / Maureen Earl vs Jennifer Clements / Jody Orr6-1, 6-1
2022-06-20vs Each Hit AgainWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeanna McMahon / Ruth Fritz vs Leslie Hughes / Cindy Biedebach6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEva VanCuren / Jill Call vs Zel Mertz / Kimberlee Megale6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-15vs Alley Kats 55Won 20
W#1 DoublesAnnette Durham / Laney Derry vs Kathy Hansen / Nancy Nelson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSherri Felton / Eva VanCuren vs Shelly Tatistcheff / Sandy Vaughan6-0, 6-0
2022-06-13vs Smash SistersSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMaureen Earl / Lisa Derry vs Julie Eisele / Mary Burke5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAnnette Durham / Laney Derry vs Dawn Crochet / Mary Chodroff4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-06-08vs Hillcrest Hot ShotsWon 30
W#1 DoublesCathy Adams / Sherri Felton vs Maureen Sykes / Lynnette Flerchinger6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLinda Butler / Lisa Derry vs Kristen Pentz-Weitz / Ahnna Dudley7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesEva VanCuren / Ruth Fritz vs Lori Barnum / Sherri Matney6-4, 7-5
2022-06-06vs No Drama MamasWon 10
W#2 DoublesSherry Huber / Jill Call vs Sandra Gulley / Vicki Henderson7-6, 6-3
2022-06-01vs COGsLost 01
L#3 DoublesSherry Huber / Ruth Fritz vs Rebecca Fitzpatrick / Valencia Bilyeu0-6, 3-6
2022-05-23vs Each Hit AgainLost 01
L#3 DoublesLinda Butler / Sherri Felton vs Cindy Biedebach / Zel Mertz3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Each Hit Again822649175
2Smash Sisters8221921207
3Touch of Gray8221921224
4No Drama Mamas55151536288
5Alley Kats 5555121841300
6COGs37111942306
7Hillcrest Hot Shots37111943314
8Nicer Aces01032755345

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Cathy Adams
published 3.5
3.25
Annette Durham
published 3.5
3.22
Eva VanCuren
published 3.5
3.17
Elaine Remley
published 3.5
2.98
Linda Butler
published 3.5
Deanna McMahon
published
Jill Call
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Laney Derry
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Lisa Derry
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Maureen Earl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published
Ruth Fritz
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Sherri Felton
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Sherry Huber
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elaine Remley + Annette Durham6355% games+6.9% vs expected
Eva VanCuren + Cathy Adams8853% games−1.6% vs expected
Linda Butler + Eva VanCuren8544% games−5.9% vs expected
Cathy Adams + Sherry Huber18855% gamesnot enough data
Laney Derry + Annette Durham24269% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Derry + Laney Derry13266% gamesnot enough data
Eva VanCuren + Maureen Earl4850% gamesnot enough data
Jill Call + Sherry Huber7264% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cathy Adams
72W–63L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Annette Durham
47W–37L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Eva VanCuren
40W–43L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Elaine Remley
56W–51L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Linda Butler
38W–35L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
Deanna McMahon
26W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jill Call
40W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laney Derry
38W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Derry
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Earl
64W–110L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruth Fritz
23W–16L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherri Felton
46W–68L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherry Huber
69W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.