Teams

Palmer 18+ 4.0 Fall

2025 USTA League Adult 18 & Over - Fall 2024- HSV · 4.0 WOMEN 18N1S3D

13 players · average NTRP 3.83 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-24vs ONeil_VanG 4.0Fall2024 18+Won 40
W#1 DoublesCheryl Saunders / TAMMY HALL vs Peggy Richardson / Makinly Baird6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNermein Lotfy vs Heather Fedesco6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRachel Carpenter / Jennifer Daniels vs Mary Hannah Robinson / Meleah Ellis7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLauren Plott / Michelle Jones vs Amelia ONeil / Jody Toms7-5, 6-3
2024-11-18vs HU - PressonLost 04
L#1 DoublesTAMMY HALL / Michelle Condurso vs Melanie Williams / Mary O'Reilly2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesGinger Green vs Linda Powell1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmanda Wheaton / Tammy Wingfield vs Hannah Witt / Kristy Haraway1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLeah Horton / Lauren Plott vs Lensey Smith / Marissa Nixon3-6, 0-6
2024-11-14vs HU - PressonLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Jones / Michelle Condurso vs Desiree Bartlett / Kristina Stenberg1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Wheaton vs Kristy Haraway4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Wingfield / Ginger Green vs Hannah Witt / Linda Powell2-6, 1-6
2024-11-11vs ONeil_VanG 4.0Fall2024 18+Won 31
W#1 DoublesMichelle Condurso / Nermein Lotfy vs Angela Pelle / Jody Toms7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGinger Green vs Meleah Ellis6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCheryl Saunders / Amy Thomas vs Carole Evans / Maribeth Newman6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTammy Wingfield / Jennifer Daniels vs Amelia ONeil / Gina VanLeeuwen6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-19vs HU - PressonLost 04
L#1 DoublesKristy Palmer / Rachel Carpenter vs Mary O'Reilly / Laura Smith1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNermein Lotfy vs Kristy Haraway3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLeah Horton / Lauren Plott vs Lindsey Bax / Kristina Stenberg2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMichelle Jones / Michelle Condurso vs Lensey Smith / Hannah Witt4-6, 4-6
2024-10-15vs ONeil_VanG 4.0Fall2024 18+Split 22
L#1 DoublesMichelle Jones / Lori Tillery vs Angela Pelle / Carole Evans1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmanda Wheaton vs Catherine Kelly6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCheryl Saunders / TAMMY HALL vs Makinly Baird / Mary Hannah Robinson6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTammy Wingfield / Cameron Thumm vs Amelia ONeil / Katy Ripley7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN 18N1S3D have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Nermein Lotfy
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Rachel Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.62
Leah Horton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Cheryl Saunders
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Lauren Plott
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
TAMMY HALL
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Amanda Wheaton
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Cameron Thumm
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Kristy Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Michelle Condurso
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.30
Ginger Green
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.29
Lori Tillery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Tammy Wingfield
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Horton + Lori Tillery6450% games+5.3% vs expected
Leah Horton + Kristy Palmer5259% games+3.7% vs expected
Rachel Carpenter + Leah Horton61046% games−1.7% vs expected
Cheryl Saunders + Lori Tillery4546% games−8.6% vs expected
Leah Horton + Cheryl Saunders5746% games−10.5% vs expected
Rachel Carpenter + Cheryl Saunders134 matchesnot enough data
TAMMY HALL + Cheryl Saunders314 matchesnot enough data
Lori Tillery + Kristy Palmer044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nermein Lotfy
39W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Rachel Carpenter
36W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Leah Horton
61W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Cheryl Saunders
50W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
Lauren Plott
45W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
TAMMY HALL
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Amanda Wheaton
21W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Cameron Thumm
46W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.54
Kristy Palmer
43W–74L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Michelle Condurso
46W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Ginger Green
96W–66L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
Lori Tillery
97W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Tammy Wingfield
42W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.