Teams

Faught/18s/3.0/TCH

2025 Man · Cov Mixed 18 & Over

16 players · average NTRP 2.90 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Chris Tusa
usually #3 Doubles 29%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.67
Celia Guillory
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.66
Chanell Charapata
usually #1 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.64
Danielle Hufft
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3
2.14
Baldwin Barkerding
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Alario
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Evan Graybill
usually #1 Singles 37%, also #1 Doubles 26% · published
Indi Mire Faught
published
Jeffrey Hufft
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Justin Clinton
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Kevin Alario
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
Kristen Muller Clinton
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
Mary Ann Tusa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mike Morgan
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Nader Shourbaji
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Sarah Mitchell
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chanell Charapata + Nader Shourbaji2443% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Alario + Justin Clinton0519% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Alario + Mike Morgan134 matchesnot enough data
Baldwin Barkerding + Mike Morgan134 matchesnot enough data
Chris Tusa + Mike Morgan123 matchesnot enough data
Danielle Hufft + Jeffrey Hufft123 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Hufft + Mike Morgan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chris Tusa
8W–36L career · 26 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Celia Guillory
8W–13L career · 14 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Chanell Charapata
13W–29L career · 20 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Danielle Hufft
19W–27L career · 25 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
2.5
Baldwin Barkerding
2W–15L career · 11 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Elizabeth Alario
9W–15L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Evan Graybill
0W–19L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Indi Mire Faught
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Hufft
2W–11L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Justin Clinton
1W–11L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Alario
1W–22L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristen Muller Clinton
4W–9L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Ann Tusa
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mike Morgan
5W–22L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nader Shourbaji
8W–26L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Mitchell
9W–28L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.