Teams

Glancy 18

2022 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 18 & OVER · WOMEN 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-23vs Tatum Girls OPWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracie McCabe / Tess Casals vs Kelly Flynn / Deedee Greene6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-05-09vs AtterburyLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracie McCabe / Tess Casals vs Lisa Gilbert / Stephanie Stevens3-6, 2-6
2022-05-04vs Murray 18+ 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesTracie McCabe / Tess Casals vs Anne Murray / Wesley Barker6-3, 6-3
2022-04-27vs Wilson 18+ 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTracie McCabe / Tess Casals vs Sharon Feiler / Lynn Felton1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-04-13Lost 01
L#3 DoublesTracie McCabe / Caitlyn Stogner vs Karen King / Margaret White6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-09vs Tatum Girls OPWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacey Anderson / Tracie McCabe vs Martha Broadbent / Julie Outlaw3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-03-21vs Murray 18+ 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesTracie McCabe / Tess Casals vs Lara Schuhmann / Trisha Kelley6-3, 6-4
2022-03-09vs STRICKLAND PVCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesTess Casals / Tracie McCabe vs Rebecca Durham / Candy Garrett6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Kristin Main
published 4.5
3.92
Lori Haskins
published
3.91
Tracie McCabe
usually #1 Singles 47%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.79
Caitlyn Stogner
published 4
3.71
Ashley Hawkins
published 4
3.57
Tess Casals
published
3.56
Caitlynn Goheen
published 4
3.49
Ally Langdon
published 3.5
3.24
Kathleen Glancy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caitlynn Goheen + Genevieve Hansler4353% games−3.9% vs expected
Lori Haskins + Tess Casals213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kristin Main
124W–55L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
Lori Haskins
25W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Tracie McCabe
279W–99L career · 16 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Genevieve Hansler
19W–18L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Caitlyn Stogner
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Ashley Hawkins
4W–12L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Tess Casals
17W–12L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
3.57
4
Caitlynn Goheen
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Ally Langdon
16W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kathleen Glancy
10W–16L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.