Teams

V - Royal Girlfriends

2022 USTA Adult 18 &Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0 WE

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-18vs V - Sunset AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelley Bannon / Sally Miller vs Jennifer Khiem / Dawn Stutzman3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-11vs V - Sunset Ooh La LaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBarb Jepson / Kathryn Pisaro vs Janice Pinnell / Cierra Smalling2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKelley Bannon / Catherine Haywood vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-05vs V - Las Posas Country Club AngelsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer House / Barb Jepson vs Becky Nelson / Krista Howard6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGizelda Parr / Catherine Haywood vs Suzanne Brenner / Keri Kettle1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-05-21vs V - Valle Lindo Volley GirlsLost 01
L#3 DoublesYoung Kang / Gizelda Parr vs Judith Cade / SUE LYONS3-6, 2-6
2022-05-01vs V - WACtown GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer House / Barb Jepson vs Robbie Knauer / Marty Fraser4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-04-24vs V - Spanish Hills Glamour SlammersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer House / Kathryn Pisaro vs Dana Hibner / Petra McCullough6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKelley Bannon / Beth Bloomfield vs Lynda Riley / Loretta Silvey5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 WE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Kimberley Bennett
published 3.5
3.12
Marilyn Germann
published
2.80
Ellen Swagerty
published 3
2.79
Kathryn Pisaro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Barb Jepson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Kelley Bannon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.52
Tes MacAraya
published
2.45
Gizelda Parr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barb Jepson + Gizelda Parr7652% games+4.2% vs expected
Kelley Bannon + Barb Jepson5941% games−9.8% vs expected
Kelley Bannon + Gizelda Parr6847% gamesnot enough data
Kathryn Pisaro + Barb Jepson4745% gamesnot enough data
Kathryn Pisaro + Kelley Bannon224 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Pisaro + Gizelda Parr033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kimberley Bennett
128W–110L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Marilyn Germann
9W–22L career · no lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
3
Ellen Swagerty
14W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Kathryn Pisaro
74W–90L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Barb Jepson
70W–61L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Kelley Bannon
48W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Tes MacAraya
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Gizelda Parr
44W–77L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%66%34%
2.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.