Teams

Happy Losers

55 & Over Mixed Doubles · 9.0 AMD Mixed Doubles

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / ALLEGHENY MNTN.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 AMD Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Highland Park000000
2Happy Losers000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
John Heide
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Julie Lichtenstein
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Frank Haley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Alex Parrish
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.43
Joan Gurson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Michelle Saad
published
Ester Hoogstaden
published
Paul Schneider
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frank Haley + Ester Hoogstaden224 matchesnot enough data
John Heide + Julie Lichtenstein314 matchesnot enough data
Frank Haley + Michelle Saad123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Heide
28W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
Julie Lichtenstein
21W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Frank Haley
117W–107L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Alex Parrish
68W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.44
Joan Gurson
51W–61L career · 3 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
3.43
Michelle Saad
130W–161L career · no lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
Ester Hoogstaden
29W–25L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Paul Schneider
55W–72L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.