Teams

YTC-Ferguson

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 MEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-05vs SC-JohnsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Fernandez / Dan Ferguson vs John Moloney / Mark Switzer6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMark Cherry / Carlos Olivares vs Frederic Rettenmund / Ron Harris4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Wing / John Asriel vs Nicholas Geranios / Jeffrey Gillespie6-1, 6-4
2021-06-05vs IND-MehlenbacherLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Fernandez / Dan Ferguson vs Vincent Beasley / Stephen Allen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMonte Scacco / Rick Brown vs Wayne Kohan / Michael Way2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Wing / John Asriel vs Todd Samuel / Lee Penick6-3, 6-4
2021-06-04vs SC-JohnsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesMark Cherry / Carlos Olivares vs John Moloney / Mark Switzer6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRick Brown / Monte Scacco vs Clark Richards / Nicholas Geranios6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Wing / John Asriel vs Steve Lamberson / Charles McElligott6-1, 6-0
2021-06-04vs IND-MehlenbacherLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Wing / Dan Ferguson vs Wayne Kohan / Michael Way1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMark Cherry / Carlos Olivares vs Evan Mehlenbacher / Walter Josephson3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRick Brown / Monte Scacco vs Todd Samuel / Lee Penick4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carlos Olivares
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dan Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
John Asriel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Fernandez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mark Cherry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Monte Scacco
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rick Brown
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 0
Robert Wing
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Asriel + Robert Wing5258% gamesnot enough data
John Fernandez + Dan Ferguson4355% gamesnot enough data
Monte Scacco + Rick Brown123 matchesnot enough data
Carlos Olivares + Mark Cherry123 matchesnot enough data
Rick Brown + Dan Ferguson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carlos Olivares
1W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Dan Ferguson
19W–36L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
John Asriel
25W–25L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
John Fernandez
14W–22L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Mark Cherry
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Monte Scacco
2W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Rick Brown
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Robert Wing
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.