Teams

OC Newport Beach TC - Christina

2025 OC Tri-Level Mixed · WE 5.0 - 4.5 - 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.35 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-06vs OC NBTC - HooverLost 01
L#3 DoublesRikki Scharnell / Alan Roof vs Justin Edwards / Mina Whitlock1-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesAdam Chaffee / Olivia Hu vs Josh Garcia / Leslie Le6-2, 6-0
2025-08-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesYork Cheng / Margaret Chang vs Lisa Nguyen / Lee Nguyen5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-08-23vs OC LLW LNRC- AviLost 01
L#1 DoublesOlivia Hu / Kevin Tran vs Sung Eun Kim / Chen-Jun Huang6-7, 4-6
2025-08-09Won 10
W#2 DoublesYork Cheng / Margaret Chang vs Nancy Chan / Steven Lindenfelser6-2, 6-2
2025-08-02vs OC NBTC - HooverWon 10
W#2 DoublesMargaret Chang / York Cheng vs Kristen Bendanna / David Watson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesOlivia Hu / Adam Chaffee vs Luna Qingyue Cai / Anil Vootkur6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WE 5.0 - 4.5 - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.74
4.57
Farrah Northcott
published
4.54
Jacky Visava
published
4.46
Jinna Johnson
published
4.45
Blair Brzeski
published 4.5
4.30
York Cheng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Daniel Tat
published 4.5
4.27
Francesco Nguyen
published
Abhinauv Venugopal
published 4.5
4.08
Margaret Chang
published
3.99
Paul Kincaid
published
3.83
Alan Roof
published 4
3.81
Olivia Hu
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Rikki Scharnell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Preethika Venugopal
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Bridget Etchegaray
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.74
Farrah Northcott
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.57
Jacky Visava
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.54
Jinna Johnson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.46
4.5
Blair Brzeski
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
4.45
4.5
York Cheng
63W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Daniel Tat
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
4.28
Francesco Nguyen
7W–12L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.27
4.5
Abhinauv Venugopal
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Christopher Contreras
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Chang
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
Paul Kincaid
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
3.99
4
Alan Roof
29W–39L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Olivia Hu
72W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.81
4
Alexander Martinez
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christina Bennett
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Rikki Scharnell
101W–99L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Preethika Venugopal
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.