Teams

SRC-Dream Team

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spokane · 4.0 WOMEN Spokane

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-28vs PFC-SpitzSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmber McCombs / Megan Carver vs Jlynn Spitz / Hayley Scroop1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLinnea Love vs Kiersten Shelby6-3, 6-1
2026-03-07vs Peak-JarvelinWon 30
W#2 DoublesMelanie Niceler / Whitney Jones vs Valerie Garcia / Mary Rawlsky6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesLinnea Love vs Abby Gardner6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMegan Carver / Amber McCombs vs Nichole Shanley / Cassandra Bomgardner7-6, 6-2
2026-02-27vs PFC-SpitzLost 03
L#1 SinglesLupine Skelly vs Marianne Thompson6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLinnea Love vs Kiersten Shelby7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmber McCombs / Katie Winter vs Miki Peck / Jessica Sherman6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-02-21vs Peak-JarvelinLost 02
L#1 SinglesNorma Velez de Villa vs Lea Williams2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLinnea Love vs Beth Ann Baker3-6, 4-6
2026-02-07vs PFC-SpitzLost 03
L#1 SinglesLupine Skelly vs Marianne Thompson3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCathy Crowson / Amber McCombs vs Miki Peck / Jessica Sherman4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMelanie Niceler / Whitney Jones vs Jlynn Spitz / Hayley Scroop6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-01-24vs Peak-JarvelinWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelanie Niceler / Whitney Jones vs Ansley Bolme / Valerie Garcia7-5, 7-5
W#1 SinglesLinnea Love vs Abby Gardner6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAmber McCombs / Lupine Skelly vs Denise Mai / Wendy Teets0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN Spokane have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Linnea Love
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.79
Cathy Crowson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Marie Fenske
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.68
Megan Carver
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Whitney Jones
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Melanie Niceler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
April Denike
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Amber McCombs
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.47
Charis Thatcher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Katie Winter
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Jenny Bryant
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Lupine Skelly
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Norma Velez de Villa
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Niceler + Amber McCombs12075% games+15.3% vs expected
Melanie Niceler + Whitney Jones6455% games+11.1% vs expected
Melanie Niceler + Katie Winter9656% games+7.2% vs expected
Katie Winter + Charis Thatcher3361% games+6.9% vs expected
Jenny Bryant + Amber McCombs2549% games+4.1% vs expected
Jenny Bryant + Lupine Skelly404 matchesnot enough data
Megan Carver + Amber McCombs224 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Crowson + Amber McCombs224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linnea Love
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Cathy Crowson
25W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
Marie Fenske
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Megan Carver
2W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
Whitney Jones
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
Melanie Niceler
54W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
April Denike
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Amber McCombs
22W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Charis Thatcher
34W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Katie Winter
20W–26L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Jenny Bryant
67W–47L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
Lupine Skelly
3W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
Norma Velez de Villa
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.