Teams

MVCC NAVY

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs BP GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesKate Colon / Stephanie Whitman vs Angela Martin / Karina Abrams4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChristyn Benzle vs Lisa Hoogendoorn Daniel3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Buchanan / Kathy Fenwick vs Kursten Koller / Erin Heltshe2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Carano / Linda Lea vs Kristen Hanson / Mara Orchard1-6, 1-6
2026-07-06vs HIW TEALWon 31
W#1 DoublesStephanie Buchanan / Kate Colon vs Kelly Murphy / Ira Chang-Richmond6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStephanie Whitman vs Jacquelyn Clark6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Carano / Kim Hassinger vs Linda Nielander / Jessica Curley6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Lea / Margaret Lea vs Susan Courtney / Randi London6-2, 6-1
2026-06-29vs NJ NAVYLost 04
L#1 DoublesMargaret Lea / Kathy Fenwick vs Barbara Westfall / Gail Berkery6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesStephanie Buchanan vs Meredith Beveridge2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKim Hassinger / Jane Reimer vs Mary Shugrue / Patti Warner4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Carano / Linda Lea vs Jill Orsatti / Donna Wolf4-6, 3-6
2026-06-22vs LTC-M PURPLELost 04
L#1 DoublesKate Colon / Margaret Lea vs Tina Atchley / Christina Santino4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Whitman vs Christine Stirling1-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Buchanan / Nadine Witte vs Laurie Lahnert / Kelly Wilson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJacqueline Carano / Linda Lea vs Kristina Klug / Jennifer Bogert2-6, 4-6
2026-06-15vs NJ REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesStephanie Buchanan / Kate Colon vs Mary Alberts / Valerie Martin7-5, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNadine Witte vs Karen Brennan6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKim Hassinger / Kathy Fenwick vs Kathleen Harvey / Kelly Costanzo6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Lea / Christyn Benzle vs Marla Tiktin / Jessie Fliss2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-08vs RHCC PURPLELost 13
L#1 DoublesMargaret Lea / Kate Colon vs Brandee Caswell / Natalia Huemoller6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesStephanie Whitman vs Cheryl Crawford6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesNadine Witte / Kim Hassinger vs Kate Dean / Melissa Bauknight2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Reimer / Linda Lea vs Tiffany Skiles / Joelle Delisa2-6, 3-6
2026-06-05vs MC YELLOWLost 13
L#1 DoublesKate Colon / Margaret Lea vs Marci Grant / Jennie Roberts1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesStephanie Buchanan vs Jennifer Arnold1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKim Hassinger / Christyn Benzle vs Jennifer Clegg / Jackie Greiner4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNadine Witte / Kathy Fenwick vs Kirsten Sharer / Kathleen Connell6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Stephanie Buchanan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.80
Kate Colon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Nadine Witte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Stephanie Whitman
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.73
Margaret Lea
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.66
Jacqueline Carano
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.63
Christyn Benzle
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Kathy Fenwick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Jane Reimer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.56
Kim Hassinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Linda Lea
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Lea + Kate Colon8652% games+0.2% vs expected
Nadine Witte + Kathy Fenwick2346% games−4.8% vs expected
Stephanie Buchanan + Stephanie Whitman3252% games−8.3% vs expected
Kim Hassinger + Kathy Fenwick2547% gamesnot enough data
Kim Hassinger + Christyn Benzle224 matchesnot enough data
Nadine Witte + Stephanie Buchanan134 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Buchanan + Kathy Fenwick134 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Whitman + Kathy Fenwick224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Buchanan
18W–33L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Kate Colon
48W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Nadine Witte
31W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Stephanie Whitman
17W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
2.74
3
Margaret Lea
18W–17L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Jacqueline Carano
1W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
3
Christyn Benzle
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Kathy Fenwick
12W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
Jane Reimer
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Kim Hassinger
24W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
Linda Lea
8W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.