Teams

Hammock Bay - Crane

2025 Collier Combo 50 & Over Spring · 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring

16 players · average NTRP 3.19 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-13vs Bonita National / MitchellWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatti Ramer / Aafke Loney vs Diane Mancini / Lea Comet1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-05-06vs Vanderbilt Country Club / WittersWon 10
W#3 DoublesPatti Ramer / Laura Hansmann vs Sharon Slozil / Jennifer Wimsatt7-5, 7-6
2025-04-29vs Players Club / RieckerLost 01
L#2 DoublesPatti Ramer / Gail Gattas vs Suzanne Jeffries / Barbara Kvitle6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-15vs sterling Oaks / BergstromLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatti Ramer / Alisa Metal vs Martha Oberstein / Tobi Weinstein2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPatti Ramer / Jennifer Currie vs K VICTORY / Roxy Painter6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 50 & Over Women Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Trina Clarkson
published
3.35
Cathy Miles
published 3.5
3.30
Deb Dorsey
published 3.5
3.24
Kelly Lord
published
3.21
Brita Swanson
published 3.5
3.18
Laraine Segar
published
2.90
Gail Gattas
published 3
2.87
Jacquie Currie
published 3
Aafke Loney
published 3
2.69
Laura Farnham
published
2.67
Alisa Metal
published 3
2.61
Laura Hansmann
published
2.53
Cheryl Trzcinski
published 3
Jennifer Currie
published
Patti Ramer
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Paula Crane
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Trzcinski + Paula Crane2642% gamesnot enough data
Laura Farnham + Gail Gattas0731% gamesnot enough data
Patti Ramer + Jacquie Currie224 matchesnot enough data
Deb Dorsey + Laraine Segar404 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Lord + Paula Crane213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trina Clarkson
34W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Cathy Miles
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Deb Dorsey
35W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Kelly Lord
23W–27L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Brita Swanson
22W–18L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Laraine Segar
22W–29L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Gail Gattas
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Jacquie Currie
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Aafke Loney
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laura Farnham
10W–24L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Alisa Metal
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
2.67
Laura Hansmann
13W–26L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.61
3
Cheryl Trzcinski
30W–70L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53
Jennifer Currie
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Patti Ramer
44W–73L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paula Crane
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.