Teams

LATA40/Feaster/LCTC

2025 Adult 40 & Over - USTA · Adult Women - 3.0 - Night

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-02-25vs LATA40/Geib/CAMPLost 14
L#1 DoublesEllen Floyd / Julie Coyle vs Lisette Geib / Anne Belue4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesSheree King vs Beverly Campbell6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLinda Sims / Collins Baker vs Beth Belcher / Gina Wilkie2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Holliday / Suzanne Flowers vs Malissa Hulon / Willine Gilliard2-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesKatherine Taylor / Batina Feaster vs Kristen Sojourner / Helen Cupertino6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.0 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Collins Baker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Danielle Salley
published 3
Ellen Floyd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Vandrea Lang
published
2.68
Susan Molair
published
2.65
Julie Coyle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
M Brinkley
published
2.54
Katherine Taylor
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Batina Feaster
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kelly Holliday
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Palmer
published
Sheree King
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Suzanne Flowers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Collins Baker
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Danielle Salley
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Ellen Floyd
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vandrea Lang
20W–37L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
2.72
Susan Molair
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Julie Coyle
8W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%<1%
2.65
M Brinkley
43W–74L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
Katherine Taylor
3W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Batina Feaster
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.50
Kelly Holliday
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Palmer
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheree King
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Suzanne Flowers
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.