Teams

We doing this again? - J. Torres

2023 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-11-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Voelker / Javid Lateef vs Paul Williams / James Schneider6-7, 2-6
2023-10-15vs Cheval No Faults - E. JacksonLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Voelker / Juan Medina vs Gregory Perpetua / Louis Hanna1-6, 3-6
2023-10-08vs HG GangGreen - E. CollinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJavid Lateef / David Voelker vs Randall Smith / John Slatniske6-2, 7-5
L#1 DoublesMichael Rossi / Javid Lateef vs CHRISTOPHER THOMPSON / Jack Korta5-7, 3-6
2023-09-24vs Temple Terrace Hawks - R. WarrenerLost 01
L#3 DoublesHenry Gales / Javid Lateef vs Alvin MacAsinag / George Hawkins3-6, 5-7
2023-09-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Voelker / Juan Medina vs Stephen McCormick / John Jackson7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Michael Rossi
published
3.65
David Voelker
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
John Orr
published
3.44
Jacob Munch
published 3.5
3.43
Javier Espinoza
published
3.42
Henry Gales
published 3.5
3.37
Javid Lateef
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.26
Scott Tashman
published
3.13
Joe Izzo
published
Luis ArroyoFreytes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Voelker + Javid Lateef134 matchesnot enough data
Javid Lateef + Joe Izzo033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Rossi
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
David Voelker
109W–90L career · 8 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
John Orr
13W–17L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Jacob Munch
24W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Javier Espinoza
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Henry Gales
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
Javid Lateef
38W–122L career · 4 lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.37
Scott Tashman
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Joe Izzo
126W–178L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
Luis ArroyoFreytes
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.