Teams

FK Big Shots - Long

2025 Marion Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult Women 40 & Over

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-16vs Marion/Greene/40&over3.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesMaria Zaldivar / Barbara Center vs Jennifer Mendola / Lauren Joyce3-6, 1-6
2025-06-08vs CCO Aces - McLellanSplit 22
W#1 DoublesOksana Velis / Cindy Hinton vs Mary Sievers / CARMEL CONNOR4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCameron Swaggerty vs Frances Ramirez2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGeorgina Bumpas / NANCY TUTEN vs Ellen Smith / Betsy Calder7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRaksha Ramkissoon / Leslie Priest vs Margie McLellan / Kristen Holland1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaria Zaldivar / Leslie Priest vs Maryse Whitsett / Carina Gandiongco6-4, 6-3
W#1 DoublesGeorgina Bumpas / NANCY TUTEN vs Caressa Gray / Cyndee Blackert7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesGretta Payne vs Sarah Osian5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCameron Swaggerty / Jolinda Fisher vs Sophia Crawley / Michelle Beck6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCindy Hinton / Denise Greer vs Desi Leibfried / JENNIFER PETRELLA6-1, 6-2
2025-04-27vs FK Fire That Shot (FTS) - BlackertSplit 22
W#1 DoublesGuisela Carrascosa / Oksana Velis vs Desi Leibfried / Lynn Crowe6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLisa Briggs vs Sarah Osian1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBarbara Center / Georgina Bumpas vs Angela Ba / Caressa Gray4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeslie Priest / Sherry Louise Gronlund vs Michelle Beck / Kelli Ditty6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-04-25vs CCO Aces - McLellanSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBarbara Center / Cindy Hinton vs CARMEL CONNOR / Mary Meek1-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesGretta Payne vs Susie Friedland6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSherry Louise Gronlund / Joan Matlock vs Mary Sievers / Kristen Holland1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNANCY TUTEN / Denise Greer vs Jenny Koch / Danielle Bouvier6-3, 6-3
2025-04-18vs CCO Aces - McLellanLost 13
L#1 DoublesCameron Swaggerty / Jolinda Fisher vs Mary Meek / Donna Davis4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLisa Briggs vs Donita Hearns6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoan Matlock / Cindy Hinton vs CARMEL CONNOR / Margie McLellan7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBETH ARMS / Denise Greer vs Ellen Smith / Kristen Holland2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Women 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Rebecca Long
published
2.89
Cindy Hinton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Michelle Broder
published
2.82
Georgina Bumpas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.82
Gretta Payne
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.81
Oksana Velis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Raksha Ramkissoon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
BETH ARMS
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
NANCY TUTEN
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.72
Cameron Swaggerty
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Jolinda Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Lisa Briggs
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.59
Joan Matlock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Maria Zaldivar
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
Barbara Center
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.45
Denise Greer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Leslie Priest
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Guisela Carrascosa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sherry Louise Gronlund
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Oksana Velis + Lisa Briggs3252% games+6.3% vs expected
Cindy Hinton + NANCY TUTEN213 matchesnot enough data
Cameron Swaggerty + Jolinda Fisher123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Long
24W–28L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
3
Cindy Hinton
27W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Michelle Broder
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
2.88
Georgina Bumpas
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Gretta Payne
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Oksana Velis
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Raksha Ramkissoon
18W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
BETH ARMS
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
NANCY TUTEN
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Cameron Swaggerty
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Jolinda Fisher
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Lisa Briggs
9W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Joan Matlock
25W–37L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59
3
Maria Zaldivar
90W–150L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Barbara Center
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Denise Greer
3W–18L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.45
Leslie Priest
4W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
Guisela Carrascosa
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sherry Louise Gronlund
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.