Teams

EW-CBRC-Mehlenbacher

2023 Mixed 55 & Over · 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.07 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-07-08vs EW-WRAC-GranardWon 21
L#1 DoublesJames Chandler / Judi Harris vs Kathleen McIver / James Roberts3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEvan Mehlenbacher / Sheila Coles vs Candis Brink / Todd Brink2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephen Allen / Lory Allen vs Christy Granard / Roger van Houten6-3, 6-3
2023-07-08vs EW-WRAC-GranardWon 30
W#1 DoublesEvan Mehlenbacher / Sheila Coles vs Kathleen McIver / James Roberts6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn Hilmes / Huijuan Zhang vs Roger van Houten / Beata Miller6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJames Chandler / Judi Harris vs Christy Granard / Dan Feil6-2, 6-1
2023-07-07vs EW-WRAC-GranardWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephen Allen / Lory Allen vs Dan Feil / Beata Miller6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEvan Mehlenbacher / Sheila Coles vs Kathleen McIver / James Roberts4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Hilmes / Huijuan Zhang vs Candis Brink / Todd Brink3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Evan Mehlenbacher
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.90
John Hilmes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Huijuan Zhang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Stephen Allen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
James Chandler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.65
Judi Harris
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.49
Lory Allen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Sheila Coles
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lory Allen + Stephen Allen61042% games−7.0% vs expected
Evan Mehlenbacher + Sheila Coles121052% gamesnot enough data
Huijuan Zhang + John Hilmes404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Evan Mehlenbacher
62W–83L career · 5 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3
John Hilmes
66W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Huijuan Zhang
20W–27L career · type M · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Stephen Allen
42W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
2.71
3
James Chandler
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Judi Harris
65W–88L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Lory Allen
23W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.49
Sheila Coles
23W–23L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.