Teams

Wyoming/Hagy/55&Over8.0W

2023 USTA 55 & OVER · 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.88 / WYOMING

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-11vs Jackson AcesWon 21
L#1 DoublesMegan Hayes / Alyson Hagy vs Linda Merigliano / Cheri Witz6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEllen Laubhan / Nancy Peck vs Renee Havens / Mimi Freymann6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTroy Ibarra / Vicky Kmetz vs Angela Emery / Kelly Milligan6-2, 6-1
2023-06-11vs Jackson AcesWon 20
W#2 DoublesNancy Peck / Ellen Laubhan vs Renee Havens / Mimi Freymann4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMegan Hayes / Troy Ibarra vs Kelly Milligan / Kristina Peterson1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-10vs Jackson AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesNancy Peck / Ellen Laubhan vs Cheri Witz / Linda Merigliano5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPamela Heiden / Megan Hayes vs Renee Havens / Mimi Freymann1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSheri Foster / Troy Ibarra vs Kristina Peterson / Angela Emery6-4, 6-4
2023-06-10vs Jackson AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesTroy Ibarra / Sheri Foster vs Kelly Milligan / Kristina Peterson6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesVicky Kmetz / Alyson Hagy vs Linda Merigliano / Angela Emery6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Women - 55 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wyoming/Hagy/55&Over8.0W317513105
2Jackson Aces135717117

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alyson Hagy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Sheri Foster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.59
Ellen Laubhan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Pamela Heiden
published
3.33
Vicky Kmetz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Megan Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Peck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Troy Ibarra
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Peck + Ellen Laubhan10162% gamesnot enough data
Megan Hayes + Ellen Laubhan8156% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Peck + Alyson Hagy213 matchesnot enough data
Megan Hayes + Alyson Hagy213 matchesnot enough data
Troy Ibarra + Sheri Foster303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alyson Hagy
10W–21L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Sheri Foster
51W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Ellen Laubhan
124W–91L career · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Pamela Heiden
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Vicky Kmetz
35W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Megan Hayes
15W–5L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Peck
18W–7L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Troy Ibarra
46W–20L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.