Teams

KNO PINK

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.36 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs KC-CC PINKLost 04
L#1 DoublesJane Webster / Megan Finesilver vs Lauri Lehan / Danielle Troy1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Zenk vs Lauren Koski - (DQ)2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLucy Floyd / Kim Haverly vs Crystal Adams / Corinne Kesner0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoane Keran / Kelly Hayes vs Kelly Fisher / Courtney Baraglia4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-05-23vs PH BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Zenk / Kelly Lownsberry vs Alison Dosher / Julie Picha7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJane Webster / Megan Finesilver vs Lori Silliman / Libby Conlin7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLucy Floyd / Kim Haverly vs Margo Livadariu / Nhung Van6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-05-16vs HRCA-N GREENLost 14
L#1 DoublesLucy Floyd / Joane Keran vs Jocelyn Bills / Sherri Partlow0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Zenk vs MISSY GOLDBERG2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJane Webster / Megan Finesilver vs Ginger Angell / Toni Chalmers7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesKelly Hayes vs Annie Tancik0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Lownsberry / Kim Haverly vs Elizabeth Freestone / Kate Marlborough5-7, 2-6
2024-05-09vs SS-HP REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesJane Webster / Beth Cooper vs Beth Pestotnik / Angela Miller1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Finesilver vs Jameela Khadiwala1-6, 3-2
L#2 DoublesKelly Hayes / Kim Haverly vs Kelley Wood / Nicole Bolick2-6, 1-6
2024-05-08vs HFII REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesKelly Lownsberry / Elizabeth Zenk vs Lauren Landen / Kim MacKendrick5-7, 6-7
W#1 SinglesMegan Finesilver vs Cody Sherrod6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJane Webster / Beth Cooper vs Holly Payne / Megan McMorris6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKim Haverly / Kelly Hayes vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-01vs HG TEALLost 14
L#1 DoublesMegan Finesilver / Joane Keran vs Whitney Cain / Joy Coulter-Brown5-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Hayes vs Mollie Smith4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKim Haverly / Kelly Lownsberry vs Amy Silverman / Elizabeth Cadkin4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Zenk vs Heidi David6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJane Webster / Lucy Floyd vs Ashley Herndon / Mary Dewar3-6, 0-6
2024-04-25vs KC-RH PURPLELost 14
L#1 DoublesJoane Keran / Elizabeth Zenk vs Kelly Lipsteuer / Laura Grush5-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesMegan Finesilver vs Kristina DeHerrera1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLucy Floyd / Beth Cooper vs Laurie Lopez / Anita Kinder6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKelly Lownsberry vs Megan Babcock3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Webster / Kim Haverly vs Abigail Lee / Shannon Buhl3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Megan Finesilver
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.24
Kelly Lownsberry
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.24
Kim Haverly
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.20
Elizabeth Zenk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Kelly Hayes
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.91
Beth Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Lucy Floyd
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.65
Jane Webster
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Joane Keran
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Zenk + Kim Haverly5354% games+7.4% vs expected
Elizabeth Zenk + Joane Keran12856% games+4.5% vs expected
Kelly Lownsberry + Jane Webster1538% games+3.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Zenk + Kelly Lownsberry4448% games+3.3% vs expected
Lucy Floyd + Kelly Lownsberry3248% games+2.5% vs expected
Kelly Hayes + Jane Webster7351% games+0.8% vs expected
Kim Haverly + Joane Keran3250% games+0.8% vs expected
Kim Haverly + Lucy Floyd6847% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Megan Finesilver
51W–40L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Kelly Lownsberry
108W–79L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Kim Haverly
75W–76L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Elizabeth Zenk
174W–106L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Kelly Hayes
11W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%34%66%
3.05
3.5
Beth Cooper
37W–76L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Lucy Floyd
49W–78L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Jane Webster
68W–125L career · 7 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
Joane Keran
27W–24L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.