Teams

HOCO-JACKSON

2024 · 2025 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall

12 players · average NTRP 3.12 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Kiara Laurent
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Shannon Hankins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Stephanie Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.08
Kannikar Dobney
published
3.08
Amanda Woods
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Emma Warren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Stacylee Johnson
published
2.80
Laura Armenta
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Brooklyn Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
2.64
Dawn Miner
published 3
Jenny Jackson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kannikar Dobney + Emma Warren6654% games−1.8% vs expected
Amber Brianne Sherwood + Laura Armenta4350% gamesnot enough data
Emma Warren + Kiara Laurent213 matchesnot enough data
Kiara Laurent + Shannon Hankins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kiara Laurent
50W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Shannon Hankins
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Stephanie Carlson
22W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
20%79%<1%
3.12
Kannikar Dobney
21W–10L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Amanda Woods
15W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Emma Warren
23W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Stacylee Johnson
45W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.03
Laura Armenta
22W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Brooklyn Jackson
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Amber Brianne Sherwood
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Dawn Miner
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
Jenny Jackson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.