Teams

Ligh/55/4.0/M/BREC

2026 BR Adult 55 & Over - Men · 4.0 BR (55&O) Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-29vs Martin/55/4.0/M/ForestLost 02
L#1 DoublesEddie Weeks / Long Nguyen vs Jeff Williams / James Bruno2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMark Holliday / Randy Ligh vs Mitch Rayborn / Kevin Simpson2-6, 1-6
2026-03-22vs Martin/55/4.0/M/ForestLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Holliday / Jay Thomas vs Guy Forrest / Forest Reis6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDuke Minton / Jody Capello vs Mitch Rayborn / Kevin Simpson5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDanny Lai / Michael Schilling vs David Thompson / Mark Christopher3-6, 5-7
2026-03-15vs Martin/55/4.0/M/ForestWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Holliday / Jay Thomas vs Mark Christopher / Jeff Martin6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRaul Molieri / Danny Lai vs Guy Forrest / Michael Phillips7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJody Capello / Long Nguyen vs Clay Berthelot / Keith Andry6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-08vs Martin/55/4.0/M/ForestLost 12
L#1 DoublesMark Holliday / Duke Minton vs Jeff Williams / Derek Stafford4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEddie Weeks / Danny Lai vs Jeff Martin / David Thompson3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRandy Ligh / Jody Capello vs Daniel Adler / Keith Andry5-7, 0-6
2026-03-01vs Martin/55/4.0/M/ForestLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Holliday / Jay Thomas vs James Bruno / Jeff Martin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonald Shipley / Raul Molieri vs Derek Stafford / Clay Berthelot3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDanny Lai / Michael Schilling vs Martin Padial / Forest Reis7-6, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.0 BR (55&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Martin/55/4.0/M/Forest4110512119
2Ligh/55/4.0/M/BREC1451023168

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Duke Minton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.68
Mark Holliday
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.65
Raul Molieri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Mark Hollingsworth
published
3.62
Eddie Weeks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Donald Shipley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Thomas Miglicco
published
3.50
Jerry Chenevert
published
3.50
John Ducote
published
3.47
Danny Lai
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Toby Waguespack
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Michael Schilling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Jody Capello
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.01
Randy Ligh
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Duke Minton
11W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.95
Mark Holliday
9W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
Raul Molieri
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.65
Mark Hollingsworth
7W–14L career · no lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Eddie Weeks
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Donald Shipley
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Thomas Miglicco
8W–17L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
Jerry Chenevert
3W–5L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
John Ducote
6W–19L career · no lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Danny Lai
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
Toby Waguespack
38W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Michael Schilling
7W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.30
Jody Capello
18W–19L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Randy Ligh
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.