Teams

KCarson-UNC

2025 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-24vs JOgle-CCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Tammy Chin6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPatty Hubbard / Marti Jenkins vs Blake Ellis / Mercer Griffin6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Tiemann / LAURIE KIEFFER vs Barbara St Clair / Jennifer Sykes6-2, 6-2
2025-04-10vs KHoekstra-HRWon 10
W#3 DoublesKate Harshbarger / Amy Tiemann vs Pamela Cherry / Sonya Linton7-5, 7-6
2025-04-03vs MPanek-HRWon 10
W#1 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Pilneyo Seo6-1, 6-0
2025-03-27vs MJenkins-CHCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Barbara van Leeuwen6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKate Harshbarger / Amy Tiemann vs Christy Bowman / Valerie Williams6-1, 6-3
2025-03-20vs JWaters-HVCCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Hadley Nixon6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPatty Hubbard / LAURIE KIEFFER vs Nancy Pike / Kensy Ryan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2025-03-17vs KWhite-YMCAWon 10
W#1 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Dr Amy Linder6-4, 6-1
2025-02-27vs KTravis-ENOLost 01
L#1 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Amy Kell3-6, 6-7
2025-02-18vs SSummers-CHTCLost 01
L#1 SinglesDana Cantrell vs Amy Strong6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Dana Cantrell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Sophie Brock
published
3.43
Marti Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Elaine Yeh
published
3.21
Kate Harshbarger
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Patty Hubbard
published
3.06
Vivian Muzyk
published
3.01
Lisa Saenz
published 3
2.95
2.87
LAURIE KIEFFER
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Harshbarger + LAURIE KIEFFER3347% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Cantrell
57W–40L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Sophie Brock
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Marti Jenkins
35W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
Elaine Yeh
14W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Kate Harshbarger
72W–35L career · 9 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Patty Hubbard
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Vivian Muzyk
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
3
Lisa Saenz
19W–21L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Brienne Caranasos
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
LAURIE KIEFFER
70W–74L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.