Teams

Charelyn

2025 Winter Blast Doubles · Women 2.5

3 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2025-02-10vs Love2playWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Cashion / Charleyn Mahoney vs Betty Herbster / Sarita Black6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-01-28vs Love Lobs...Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDeborah Cashion / Blair Scheepers vs Taylor Austin / Sondra Simmons0-6, 0-6
2025-01-26vs Hot ShotsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharleyn Mahoney / Jennifer Mcmillan vs Angie Aycock / Jennifer Parker1-6, 4-6
2025-01-25vs Deucey LuceysWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharleyn Mahoney / Paris Sellers vs Michelle Huffman / Sharon Taylor6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-01-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDeborah Cashion / Jennifer Mcmillan vs Susan Davis / Beth Martin2-6, 1-6
2025-01-16vs Net NinjasWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharleyn Mahoney / Anna Shamsnia vs Beth Bechtold / Laura Lever6-2, 6-1
2025-01-09vs Baby Got BackhandWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharleyn Mahoney / Amy Harline vs Blair Scheepers / Jessica Gibney6-3, 6-1
2025-01-03vs Love2playWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Cashion / Charleyn Mahoney vs Brenda Stevens / Sarita Black6-3, 6-0
2025-01-01vs Deuce BabyLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharleyn Mahoney / Blair Scheepers vs Staci Shafer / Ana Paula Schweitzer3-6, 0-6
2024-12-12vs Baby Got BackhandWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Cashion / Amy Harline vs Brannon Earles / Blair Scheepers6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-12-12vs Love2playWon 10
W#1 DoublesDeborah Cashion / Anna Shamsnia vs MARTHA LORD / Sarita Black6-4, 7-5
2024-12-02vs Yule LoseLost 01
L#1 DoublesBlair Scheepers / Deborah Cashion vs Hilary May / Lauren Everley1-6, 0-6
2024-11-19vs Net NinjasWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmy Harline / Anna Shamsnia vs Beth Bechtold / Laura Lever3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-11-18vs Comin in HotLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharleyn Mahoney / Blair Scheepers vs Karen Shokes / Maria Sherrill3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Amy Harline
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Charleyn Mahoney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.01
Deborah Cashion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charleyn Mahoney + Deborah Cashion5647% games−8.4% vs expected
Charleyn Mahoney + Amy Harline123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Harline
74W–45L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Charleyn Mahoney
57W–123L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56
2.5
Deborah Cashion
35W–136L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.