Teams

WTC: Tri-4.0 Tri & Stop Us

2026 Tri Level Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.58 / SOUTHERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-12vs Matchpoint: TriUmphantLost 01
L#3 DoublesPaisley Fenyes / Lauren Solimando vs Mara Todisco / Susan Tudisco6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-03-29vs Armonk Domes Honey DeucesWon 10
W#3 DoublesPuja Chandiramani / Lauren Mattson vs Maria Pedersen / Anne Kelly3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-03-15vs Club Fit BriarcliffWon 20
W#2 DoublesChantal Adair / Janine Huiskes vs Christine Moore / Jennifer Sheehy6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPaisley Fenyes / Cecelia Rees vs Lei Liang / Yanshu Li6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-14vs NRRC: StarstruckSplit 11
W#2 DoublesChantal Adair / Janine Huiskes vs Jennifer Golden / Danielle Morgan6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesPaisley Fenyes / Inga Skuratovsky vs Ingrid Mudge / Danielle Mebert4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-03-01vs WTC: The Hot ShotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesPuja Chandiramani / Erikka Coppel vs Erika Zauner / Donna Durvasula6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLauren Solimando / Paisley Fenyes vs Sarah Miller / Leana Rahman6-3, 6-0
2026-01-30vs 4.0 TIA New Rochelle Tri-LevelWon 10
W#3 DoublesPuja Chandiramani / Lauren Solimando vs Sukaina Klein / Melina Roth6-3, 6-2
2026-01-10vs WTC: Tri-4.5 Triple Threat - 4.5 WLost 01
L#3 DoublesLauren Mattson / Lauren Solimando vs Marlena Simmons / Louise Hagstrom3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Lauren Lazar
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.84
Lindsay Martin
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
3.84
Kimberly Heavey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.83
Debbie Cannavino
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Allison Gibbs
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.44
Kate Fix
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Christina Adair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Chantal Adair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ashley Smith
published 3.5
3.20
Janine Huiskes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Leah Viault
published
3.18
3.07
Cecelia Rees
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Lauren Solimando
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Lauren Mattson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Inga Skuratovsky
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Puja Chandiramani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Paisley Fenyes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Erikka Coppel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chantal Adair + KRISTIANA Alyce Wilson33663% games+11.8% vs expected
Debbie Cannavino + Lindsay Martin6068% games+10.4% vs expected
Allison Gibbs + Lindsay Martin5156% games+6.8% vs expected
Lauren Solimando + Inga Skuratovsky5260% games+3.9% vs expected
Lauren Solimando + Lauren Mattson3351% games+3.2% vs expected
Puja Chandiramani + Lauren Solimando3352% games−0.7% vs expected
Christina Adair + Chantal Adair3352% games−2.1% vs expected
Lauren Lazar + Lindsay Martin5059% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Lazar
175W–85L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%20%
3.88
Lindsay Martin
108W–74L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Kimberly Heavey
76W–26L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Debbie Cannavino
114W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Allison Gibbs
177W–169L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Kate Fix
122W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Christina Adair
38W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.42
3.5
Chantal Adair
67W–24L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Ashley Smith
11W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Janine Huiskes
42W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
Leah Viault
74W–45L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
KRISTIANA Alyce Wilson
47W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Cecelia Rees
37W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.07
Lauren Solimando
65W–51L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.97
Lauren Mattson
61W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
Inga Skuratovsky
33W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Puja Chandiramani
59W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Paisley Fenyes
125W–92L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
Erikka Coppel
42W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.