Teams

Mckenna/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-20vs Miller/MemphisLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichael Gattas / Brent Church vs Scott Walker / Matthew Beickert2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesLudovic Bruneau vs Alex Jankov5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobert Bradsher / Josh Gettys vs Doug Wilson / Rollin Riggs6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesClark Story / Jacob Monteverde vs John Castany / James French3-6, 3-6
2024-11-02vs Cooper/MemphisWon 32
L#1 DoublesBrent Church / Clark Story vs Noah Blank / Kevin Gallimore2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesRobert Bradsher vs Dylan Plumlee6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Gattas / Josh Gettys vs Jay Knight / Jeffery Suber2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesZach Pretzer vs Paul Johnston6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Langley / Price Edwards vs Rob Dannemiller / Michael Yearwood6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Robert Langley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Josh Gettys
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Robert Bradsher
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
3.15
Zach Pretzer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.06
Doug Schrank
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Price Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.88
Ludovic Bruneau
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.86
Jacob Monteverde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Brent Church
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.70
Clark Story
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Michael Gattas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacob Monteverde + Clark Story1436% games−17.2% vs expected
Ludovic Bruneau + Brent Church123 matchesnot enough data
Price Edwards + Robert Bradsher213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Langley
9W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.56
Josh Gettys
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Robert Bradsher
21W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
Zach Pretzer
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Doug Schrank
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Price Edwards
19W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
Ludovic Bruneau
9W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Jacob Monteverde
7W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Brent Church
10W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Clark Story
2W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Michael Gattas
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.