Teams

SDNC 7.0 Rancho Santa Fe TC/ Bastias

2021 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Summer - SDNC · SDNC - 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesMarisel Bastias / Derek Clotfelter vs Dave Chow / Melanie Rundle6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKatherine Nakamura / Jeff Kelleher vs Douglas Lee / Clare Lemon6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJeff Kelleher / Ann Ortel vs Mark Rezac / Lisa Sherwood3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesStacey Pennington / Jeff Kelleher vs Sam Savage / Amie Destremps4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarisel Bastias / Derek Clotfelter vs Mark Rezac / Lisa Sherwood2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarisel Bastias / Derek Clotfelter vs Anne Case / Mark Lindsey6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2021-06-19vs SDNC LLW 7.0 RBS&TC/ MaddenLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarisel Bastias / Derek Clotfelter vs Sun Lee / Holmes Chuang0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Tanner / Jeff Kelleher vs Leanne Kiviharju / Michael Busch6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMarisel Bastias / Derek Clotfelter vs Clare Lemon / Robert Picunko1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-06-05vs SDNC 7.0 RPTC/ TalliacSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMolly Tanner / Jeff Kelleher vs Ting Chao / Derchang Chao4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMarisel Bastias / Derek Clotfelter vs Liz Perkins / Wei Cheng6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Edward Kardas
published 4
3.68
3.42
Derek Clotfelter
published 3.5
3.19
Marisel Bastias
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Molly Tanner
published
3.14
3.01
Tricia Bothmer
published
2.93
Ann Ortel
published 3.5
Jeff Kelleher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
LJ Nicholas
published
Stacey Pennington
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edward Kardas
7W–1L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Katherine Nakamura
40W–29L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
3.5
Derek Clotfelter
10W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Marisel Bastias
116W–100L career · 6 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
Molly Tanner
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.17
Matias Clotfelter Bastias
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.14
Tricia Bothmer
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Ann Ortel
0W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2021
71%29%<1%
2.93
Jeff Kelleher
30W–57L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
LJ Nicholas
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Stacey Pennington
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.