Teams

ALPINE HILLS 40AW3.0A

2024 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Allison Carlson
published 3.5
3.39
Kate Fenwick
published
3.23
Lauren Sagan
published
3.22
3.22
Allison Moser
published 3.5
3.10
Leila Mehra
published
3.01
Janeen Poutre
published
2.90
Aimee Armsby
published 3
2.89
Sally Ann Reiss
published
2.77
Emily Lopez
published 3
2.73
Sylvia Thompson
published
2.66
Jami Worthington
published 3
2.62
Tine Normann-Badger
published
2.61
Melissa Land
published
2.58
Olivia Ward
published
2.36
Teresa Byrne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Carlson + Kate Fenwick213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Carlson
15W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
Kate Fenwick
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.39
Lauren Sagan
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
Susan Miller Hornbeek
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Allison Moser
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%2%
3.22
Leila Mehra
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.10
Janeen Poutre
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
0%<1%>99%
3.01
3
Aimee Armsby
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
Sally Ann Reiss
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
Emily Lopez
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
Sylvia Thompson
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%4%96%
2.73
3
Jami Worthington
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
2.66
Tine Normann-Badger
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.62
Melissa Land
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
2.61
Olivia Ward
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.58
Teresa Byrne
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%86%14%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.