Teams

MMetzl (Sardis)

2026 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.18 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-09-02vs SHarris/KSmith (Park Road)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCynthia Hoover / Claudia Prager vs Caroline Heller / Kendall Smith6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Rocha / Celeste Horton vs Sarah Harris / Jeanette Pellot6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLauren Earley / Elizabeth Hartzog vs Sarah Sedaghat / Maddy Middleton6-1, 6-3
2026-08-26vs KCronin/LFerguson (Piper Glen)Won 21
W#1 DoublesHeather Carter / Ashley Dutton vs Anne Coskey / Kathy Harborne6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKatherine Currier / Martha Metzl vs Sarah Garner / Stacey Whitney6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMandy Occhipinti / Lauren Rocha vs Kim Sheehey / Trisha Smith3-6, 1-6
2026-08-19vs EAnderson (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAshley Dutton / Karie Greathouse vs Lori DiFazio / Devon Fuller4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesShawna Knutson / Jane Bee vs Rachel Miller / Jami Stone6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLauren Rocha / Celeste Horton vs Katie White / RACHEL Patterson3-6, 2-6
2026-08-12vs CArevalo (Park Road)Won 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Hoover / Heather Carter vs Kathy Lucas / Lisa Morgan6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAshley Dutton / Mandy Occhipinti vs Connie Arevalo / Zahide Marenic4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLauren Earley / Karie Greathouse vs Gladys Shinmoto / Carla Sweeney6-2, 6-1
2026-08-05vs JHargis (Pine Lake)Won 30
W#1 DoublesHeather Carter / Martha Metzl vs Rebecca Lothe / Lynsey Weber6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJane Bee / Claudia Prager vs Kelly Guadagnino / Karen Holbrook6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Earley / Celeste Horton vs Virginia Borkey / Kelly Edwards6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings35 teams · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Cynthia Hoover
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.62
Jane Bee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Martha Metzl
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.47
Ashley Dutton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.34
Alexis Cochran
published 3.5
3.11
Lauren Earley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Shawna Knutson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Heather Carter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.97
Celeste Horton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Claudia Prager
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.95
Karie Greathouse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Katherine Currier
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Elizabeth Hartzog
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Mandy Occhipinti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lauren Rocha
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martha Metzl + Heather Carter5170% games+17.2% vs expected
Katherine Currier + Heather Carter3253% gamesnot enough data
Karie Greathouse + Jane Bee224 matchesnot enough data
Shawna Knutson + Celeste Horton033 matchesnot enough data
Martha Metzl + Cynthia Hoover303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Hoover
303W–124L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.69
Jane Bee
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Martha Metzl
153W–69L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Ashley Dutton
23W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Alexis Cochran
57W–34L career · no lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
Lauren Earley
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.11
Shawna Knutson
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Heather Carter
35W–21L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Celeste Horton
16W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Claudia Prager
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Karie Greathouse
67W–82L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Katherine Currier
32W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Elizabeth Hartzog
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Mandy Occhipinti
24W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Lauren Rocha
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.