Teams

SATL/DMason/CCS

USTA Combo 40 & Over · Women - 7.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-09-02vs SATL40/NBerry/Beech SpringsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMeg Clayton / Elizabeth Malcolm vs Kelly Birch / Kim Brooks6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Stille / Hadley Inabinet vs Cristina Koehler / Edie Clator6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaige Oberg / Katherine Langley vs Kara Wheeler / Cathy Brinegar6-3, 6-4
2026-08-19vs SATL40/NBerry/Beech SpringsWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Malcolm / Dana Mason vs Cathy Brinegar / Kara Wheeler6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMeg Clayton / Hadley Inabinet vs Kelly Birch / Kim Brooks4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKatherine Langley / Laura Stille vs Catherine Hunt / Hally Postlewaite7-6, 7-6
2026-08-05vs SATL40/NBerry/Beech SpringsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKaren Mobley / Elizabeth Malcolm vs Kim Brooks / Kelly Birch3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTory Champion / Sally Coker vs Natalie Barry / Amy Austin0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women - 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Meg Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Becky Berry
published 4
Dana Mason
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Elizabeth Malcolm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.62
Mary Anne Larkin
published
3.27
Katherine Langley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.26
Hadley Inabinet
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Carolyn Crenshaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Sally Coker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Mobley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katie Humeniuk
published
Laura Stille
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michaelle King
published
Paige Oberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tory Champion
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hadley Inabinet + Elizabeth Malcolm12067% games+21.7% vs expected
Paige Oberg + Katherine Langley303 matchesnot enough data
Karen Mobley + Tory Champion303 matchesnot enough data
Karen Mobley + Katherine Langley123 matchesnot enough data
Hadley Inabinet + Katherine Langley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Meg Clayton
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Becky Berry
0W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Dana Mason
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Malcolm
57W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.66
Mary Anne Larkin
18W–9L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.62
Katherine Langley
20W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Hadley Inabinet
25W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Carolyn Crenshaw
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Sally Coker
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
Karen Mobley
12W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Katie Humeniuk
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Stille
5W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michaelle King
9W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Paige Oberg
6W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Tory Champion
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.