Teams

CTL18/Beall/CTC

Mixed Doubles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Mixed 8.0

24 players · average NTRP 4.10 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Angie Rucker
published 4.5
4.26
Andrew Wescott
published 4.5
4.23
Justin Rodgers
published
4.03
Katie Meyers
published
4.01
Elle Klein
published
3.95
Kevin Felkel
published
3.86
Caroline King
published 4
3.83
Andrew Kaczynski
published 4
3.81
Daniel Goolsby
published 4
3.75
Michael Beall
published
3.69
Joshua Estes
published
3.67
Chrissy Raynor
published 4
3.63
3.63
Monica Gaddis
published
3.60
Catherine Lesser
published 4
3.53
Dana Burke
published 4
3.50
Jeremy Pow
published
3.32
Raine Cherry
published
3.21
Amy Beall
published 4
Jessica Hallman
published
Julianne Felton
published
Justin Peterson
published
Michael Pordes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Beall + Michael Beall1449% gamesnot enough data
Amy Beall + Daniel Goolsby213 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Goolsby + Elle Klein213 matchesnot enough data
Monica Gaddis + Kevin Felkel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angie Rucker
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Andrew Wescott
26W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
4.26
Justin Rodgers
52W–21L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Katie Meyers
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
4.03
Elle Klein
36W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%46%54%
4.01
Kevin Felkel
79W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
Caroline King
83W–29L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Andrew Kaczynski
45W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Daniel Goolsby
39W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Michael Beall
32W–39L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Joshua Estes
27W–23L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Chrissy Raynor
38W–21L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Cecilia Depret-Bixio
77W–35L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
Monica Gaddis
49W–39L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.63
4
Catherine Lesser
77W–72L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.60
4
Dana Burke
61W–28L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jeremy Pow
23W–18L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Raine Cherry
31W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
4
Amy Beall
63W–37L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.21
Jaimee Gauthier-Pensa
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jessica Hallman
44W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julianne Felton
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Justin Peterson
68W–51L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Pordes
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.