Teams

Sarasota - Plantation/Horton

2022 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 W Thursday

11 players · average NTRP 4.08 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-30vs LBK Public AllenLost 01
L#2 DoublesCynthia Horton / Claudia Schmidt vs Karen Kurgan / Margaret Stanton7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2022-03-17vs LWR SosaWon 20
W#2 DoublesSuyuan Mason / Claudia Schmidt vs Angela Heck / Sheila Sosa6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAna Areosa / Susie Lentile vs Andrea Deitch / Hayley Englander1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-03-10vs Payne Park NoaWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Costa / Claudia Schmidt vs Teresa Noa / Nancy Platkin6-0, 6-0
2022-03-03vs LBK Club RobersonSplit 11
L#2 DoublesLesli Andrews / Audrey Cohn vs Sue Campbell / Kathleen Bavely4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAna Areosa / Susie Lentile vs Christina DeCarlo / Judilyn Kvilhaug6-3, 6-4
2022-02-24vs SSC MikeWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanet Kramer / Claudia Schmidt vs Marsha Timm / Roberta Smith6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-02-17vs LWR ZeiglerLost 01
L#3 DoublesClaudia Schmidt / Audrey Cohn vs Betty Jo Zeigler / Diana Stadelnikas2-6, 6-7
2022-02-10vs LWN SherrWon 20
W#1 DoublesJanet Kramer / Claudia Schmidt vs Gabriela Stai / Suzanne Bewick6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAna Areosa / Suyuan Mason vs Wanda Gilbert / Cynthia Norwood4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-03vs LBK Club LidskyWon 10
W#2 DoublesAna Areosa / Claudia Schmidt vs Linda Gillott / Deborah Lynch3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-01-13vs Longwood SeiderWon 10
W#2 DoublesCynthia Horton / Claudia Schmidt vs Judith Lubbers / Joyce Bastarache3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Susan Gammon
published
4.09
Beth Costa
published 4.5
3.90
Ana Areosa
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Claudia Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.69
Audrey Cohn
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.62
Cynthia Horton
published 4
3.61
Eileen Hendrick
published 4
3.47
Lesli Andrews
published
3.21
Shelley Heller
published
Janet Kramer
published
Lou Ann Hippensteel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Areosa + Janet Kramer314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Gammon
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Beth Costa
26W–16L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
4.09
4
Ana Areosa
141W–119L career · 12 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
Claudia Schmidt
34W–25L career · 8 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Audrey Cohn
146W–120L career · 7 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Cynthia Horton
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Eileen Hendrick
11W–21L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
Lesli Andrews
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.47
Shelley Heller
47W–19L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Janet Kramer
20W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lou Ann Hippensteel
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.