Teams

Harrison TC (Tammy Johnston)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.5 Women (Michelle Wilkinson)

19 players · average NTRP 4.60 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.5 Women (Michelle Wilkinson) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.67
Amy Means
published 5
4.49
Lindsey Argano
published
4.49
Alisa Price
published 5
4.35
Taylor McNeil
published
4.25
Mandy Cagle
published
4.24
Sarah Dellinger
published
4.23
Kathryn Hausner
published
4.23
Wendi Stanley
published
4.21
Tammy Johnston
published
4.17
Catherine Levine
published 4.5
4.17
Heather Rodriguez
published 4.5
4.17
Penny Walton
published
4.14
Kim Freeman
published
4.13
Jennifer Kenney
published
4.05
Kathy Harrie
published
3.91
Laurel Currivan
published
Danielle Armour
published 4
Jill Walter
published
Margaret Dudacek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Penny Walton + Tammy Johnston6256% games+12.4% vs expected
Penny Walton + Amy Means15365% games+10.2% vs expected
Sarah Dellinger + Catherine Levine12359% games+4.0% vs expected
Heather Rodriguez + Jill Walter4262% games+3.8% vs expected
Alisa Price + Tammy Johnston3256% games−2.2% vs expected
Penny Walton + Jennifer Kenney41345% games−4.6% vs expected
Penny Walton + Lindsey Argano6159% games−4.9% vs expected
Lindsey Argano + Jennifer Kenney4353% games−5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Amy Means
30W–6L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.67
Lindsey Argano
48W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
4.49
5
Alisa Price
37W–16L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
4.49
Taylor McNeil
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
4.35
Mandy Cagle
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
Sarah Dellinger
46W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Kathryn Hausner
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Wendi Stanley
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Tammy Johnston
71W–24L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Catherine Levine
28W–11L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Heather Rodriguez
38W–33L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
Penny Walton
70W–43L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
Kim Freeman
39W–49L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
Jennifer Kenney
23W–40L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
Kathy Harrie
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
4.05
Laurel Currivan
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Danielle Armour
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Walter
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Margaret Dudacek
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.