Teams

IRMSL/Williams/COMBO50&Over7.5W

2023 IRMSL Combo 50 & Over · 7.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-11-21vs Boulevard - KushnerLost 01
L#2 DoublesTheresa Dubiel / Eileen Cusumano vs Leslie London / Cheryl von Zielinski6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-11-14vs Boulevard - KushnerWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandy Palma / Dina Cummings vs Claudia Berk / Cynthia Croom6-1, 6-2
2023-11-07vs Boulevard - KushnerLost 01
L#1 DoublesTheresa Dubiel / Eileen Cusumano vs Leslie London / Rachael McLaurin4-6, 4-6
2023-10-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesSandy Palma / Dina Cummings vs Katie Winslow / Toni Angotti6-1, 7-6
2023-10-24vs Boulevard - KushnerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandy Palma / Gillian Boice vs Anita Venner / Risa StClair5-7, 5-7
2023-10-19vs Boulevard - KushnerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandy Palma / Dina Cummings vs Anita Venner / Mary Lunn6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2023-10-17vs Boulevard - KushnerLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandy Palma / Ronnie Williams vs Marta Gannon / Rachael McLaurin2-6, 4-6
2023-10-10vs Boulevard - KushnerWon 10
W#1 DoublesSandy Palma / Dina Cummings vs Mary Bowman / Sue Davis6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Dina Cummings
published 4
3.84
Lori Glaspey
published
3.84
Sandy Palma
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
3.69
Theresa Dubiel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.61
Beth Daly
published 4
3.31
Gillian Boice
published 3.5
3.23
Eileen Cusumano
published 3.5
3.16
SHERRY SKINNER
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Palma + Dina Cummings7064% games−2.0% vs expected
Theresa Dubiel + Sandy Palma4353% gamesnot enough data
SHERRY SKINNER + Gillian Boice033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dina Cummings
17W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.96
Lori Glaspey
13W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
Sandy Palma
119W–104L career · 14 lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
Theresa Dubiel
49W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Beth Daly
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Gillian Boice
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Eileen Cusumano
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
SHERRY SKINNER
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.16
Marie-Paule Cafmeyer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.